The whole cumulative final — weeks 1–8 in one place
Loading your progress…
Units
The badge on each unit is how much of it we have checked against the assigned textbook — ✓ verified, ◑ partly, ○ not yet, ! two sources disagree. It is not your progress; that is the bar underneath.
At least one point in this unit has two sources saying different things, and it is not resolved. That outranks the score — an open disagreement matters more than a high percentage.
Ch. 9 read in full with 24 corrections applied; Ch. 10 and Ch. 22 have since arrived and been checked. Four points where the textbook and your own course material disagree are flagged on the cards.
The percentage is how much has been LOOKED UP, not how much is correct. To check a single card, open its badge — it names the chapter or slide behind that card.
✓At least one point in this unit has two sources saying different things, and it is not resolved. That outranks the score — an open disagreement matters more than a high percentage.
Every concept in unit 2 now has a textbook citation. Two conflicts stay open, and the contraindication rule on the vaccines card is still unsourced.
The percentage is how much has been LOOKED UP, not how much is correct. To check a single card, open its badge — it names the chapter or slide behind that card.
✓At least one point in this unit has two sources saying different things, and it is not resolved. That outranks the score — an open disagreement matters more than a high percentage.
All sixteen concepts are sourced. Thirteen are textbook-checked; the heart-failure staging pair comes from week 2 slides 64 and 65, and is absent from the complete Ch. 32.
The percentage is how much has been LOOKED UP, not how much is correct. To check a single card, open its badge — it names the chapter or slide behind that card.
✓Some of this unit is confirmed against the assigned chapter and some is not. The per-card badges say which is which.
Every concept is textbook-checked. Ch. 34 defines the lung volumes but gives no TLC/RV direction and no cutoffs, so the card percentages stay slide-derived — now said on the card.
The percentage is how much has been LOOKED UP, not how much is correct. To check a single card, open its badge — it names the chapter or slide behind that card.
✓Some of this unit is confirmed against the assigned chapter and some is not. The per-card badges say which is which.
Every one of the 25 concepts is now textbook-checked. Ch. 26 closed the BPH cluster, which held the unit’s last unsourced card.
The percentage is how much has been LOOKED UP, not how much is correct. To check a single card, open its badge — it names the chapter or slide behind that card.
✓At least one point in this unit has two sources saying different things, and it is not resolved. That outranks the score — an open disagreement matters more than a high percentage.
All 26 cards re-read against Ch. 41 and checked claim by claim. Two are partial and say so on the card: esophageal stricture risk factors, which no source lists, and appendectomy risk, where the sources answer a different question. One real disagreement inside the textbook is flagged on the appendectomy card.
The percentage is how much has been LOOKED UP, not how much is correct. To check a single card, open its badge — it names the chapter or slide behind that card.
✓Every concept in this unit has been checked against the assigned chapter, and no source disagreements are open.
All 13 cards re-read against Ch. 19. Two are partial and say so: risk factors for depression, which the chapter never assembles into a list, and principles of prescribing antidepressants, where no titration, monitoring, black-box or discontinuation guidance exists in any source held. One card is slides-backed rather than textbook-backed.
The percentage is how much has been LOOKED UP, not how much is correct. To check a single card, open its badge — it names the chapter or slide behind that card.
✓At least one point in this unit has two sources saying different things, and it is not resolved. That outranks the score — an open disagreement matters more than a high percentage.
All 12 cards re-read against Ch. 21 and Ch. 22. One is partial and says so: evaluating treatment by TSH, where the diagnostic pattern is taught thoroughly and the dose-titration mechanic is taught nowhere. One real disagreement between the textbook and your own deck is flagged, on the diabetes diagnosis card.
The percentage is how much has been LOOKED UP, not how much is correct. To check a single card, open its badge — it names the chapter or slide behind that card.
✓Some of this unit is confirmed against the assigned chapter and some is not. The per-card badges say which is which.
All 10 cards written from Ch. 17/18 plus the week 7 webinar, then checked claim by claim by a reader who did not write them. Two are textbook-only because the webinar never covers them — Guillain-Barré and bacterial meningitis. Myasthenia's severity classes (cnsc7) are the instructor's flagged item, but the McCance Class I–V table is in none of the held sources, so the card names that gap rather than inventing it. MS risk factors (cnsc4) are partial: the book itself calls several 'inconclusive.'
The percentage is how much has been LOOKED UP, not how much is correct. To check a single card, open its badge — it names the chapter or slide behind that card.
✓Every concept in this unit has been checked against the assigned chapter, and no source disagreements are open.
Every card is written and checked against the assigned textbook. There is no Week 8 slide deck or webinar, so unlike Weeks 5–7 there is no instructor-emphasis layer — the badge reflects textbook verification only. Two cards are partial: migraine risk factors and TIA risk factors, because the book prints no labelled list for either and each card assembles scattered data honestly.
The percentage is how much has been LOOKED UP, not how much is correct. To check a single card, open its badge — it names the chapter or slide behind that card.
✓Some of this unit is confirmed against the assigned chapter and some is not. The per-card badges say which is which.
All three cards are written and checked against the assigned textbook; no Week 8 deck or webinar exists, so the badge reflects textbook verification only. The rosacea card is partial: the chapter describes rosacea's appearance in full but never states how it is diagnosed, so the card teaches the clinical picture and flags the missing method.
The percentage is how much has been LOOKED UP, not how much is correct. To check a single card, open its badge — it names the chapter or slide behind that card.
✓Extras
Not course units — three decks this guide builds on top of them. Nothing new to learn here; it is units 1–5 rearranged for the last day, plus the questions your instructor wrote.
Exam facts
How to use this guide
This is the whole cumulative final in one deck — all 11 units, weeks 1 through 8, 149 concepts, one per screen.
Assembled from two guides that keep their own sources: the midterm (weeks 1–4) and the weeks-5-8 guide. Between them, McCance & Huether 9th ed. and the instructor's Clinical Reasoning decks and webinars; the school's own study guides supply the topic lists. Each card's badge names what backs it.