All 13 cards re-read against Ch. 19. Two are partial and say so: risk factors for depression, which the chapter never assembles into a list, and principles of prescribing antidepressants, where no titration, monitoring, black-box or discontinuation guidance exists in any source held. One card is slides-backed rather than textbook-backed.
The percentage is how much has been LOOKED UP, not how much is correct. To check a single card, open its badge — it names the chapter or slide behind that card.
The diagnostic threshold and the required-symptom rule were checked against Box 19.2, and the >5% weight change figure with them. The suicide paragraph was verified separately because it is the highest-consequence content on the card: the 10–15% figure and all four contributing factors are the chapter's.
Check it yourself: open McCance & Huether Ch. 19 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Major depression is diagnosed by counting symptoms — you need at least five of nine over a 2-week period, and one of those five has to be a low mood or a loss of interest in things.
The threshold is testable on its own. Five or more of nine symptoms, present for a 2-week period, and at least one of the five must be either depressed mood or loss of interest or pleasure. A question that lists four symptoms, or that lists five while skipping both of those two, does not meet the definition.
The nine symptoms
Symptom
Notes
Depressed or irritable mood
One of the two symptoms that can satisfy the 'at least one' rule above
Loss of interest and pleasure (anhedonia)
The other symptom that can satisfy the 'at least one' rule
Weight or appetite change
A significant change is more than 5% of body weight gained or lost in a month
Insomnia or hypersomnia
Trouble sleeping, or sleeping too much
Psychomotor agitation or retardation
Visibly speeded up and restless, or visibly slowed down
Fatigue or loss of energy
Feelings of worthlessness or excessive guilt
Poor concentration or indecisiveness
Recent thoughts of death or suicide
Sadness and despair that don't lift are the core of it. Sleep breaks down in two different ways: trouble falling asleep, or waking in the middle of the night and lying awake for hours, unable to get back to sleep. Some people slow down and feel drained; others feel restless and agitated instead. Ordinary situations start to feel like they're heading for disaster, and concentrating at work or school gets much harder.
Episodes can start suddenly or build gradually, and can last from a few weeks to months. About 20% of people have a chronic form that doesn't fully lift between episodes.
Suicide risk belongs on this card, not as an aside. Depression raises suicide risk, and suicide occurs in 10% to 15% of people with depression. The factors linked to that risk: living alone or being divorced, a past history of drug abuse or a past suicide attempt, and depression starting at midlife or later.
The threshold is part of the answer. Major depression is diagnosed when five or more of these symptoms are present in a 2-week period, and at least one of them is either depressed mood or loss of interest or pleasure. A question that lists four symptoms, or that lists five without either of the two required ones, is testing this rule.
The nine symptoms, as the textbook lists them:
Depressed or irritable mood(required, or the next one)
Loss of interests and pleasure — anhedonia(required, or the previous one)
Significant (>5%) weight gain or loss in a month — or change in appetite
Insomnia or hypersomnia
Psychomotor agitation or retardation
Fatigue or loss of energy
Feelings of worthlessness or excessive guilt
Poor concentration or indecisiveness
Recent thoughts of death or suicide
What it looks like clinically. Sadness and despair that do not let up. Alongside that painful, dysphoric mood come sleeplessness, appetite and weight falling away, and a withdrawal of interest from both pleasures and people. The sleep problem takes two forms: trouble getting to sleep, or waking in the middle of the night and lying there for hours, unable to get back. Movement slows and fatigue is marked in some; others are restless and agitated. Ordinary situations get read as heading for a bad outcome. Working and concentrating both become much harder.
Depressive episodes may begin suddenly or gradually and continue for a few weeks to months. About 20% exhibit a chronic form. The deck adds irritability, social withdrawal and physical symptoms to the picture.
Suicide risk is part of this card, not a footnote. Suicidal risk increases in depression, and suicide occurs in 10% to 15% of depressed individuals. The factors the textbook names as contributing: living alone or being divorced, a prior history of drug abuse or suicide attempt, and depression at midlife or older ages.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookMcCance & Huether Ch. 19 — Box 19.2 Major Symptoms of Depression and Mania; Depression, Clinical Manifestations
Box 19.2's nine symptoms with the five-in-two-weeks threshold and the requirement that one be depressed mood or loss of interest; unremitting sadness with middle-of-the-night waking; about 20% chronic; suicide in 10% to 15%, with four named contributing factors.
◆SlidesWeek 5 deck, slide 59
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Risk factors for depression
◐textbook
◐textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Only part of this concept is covered by that source.
PARTIAL, and the card opens by saying so. Every fact was located and verified, but they sit in four separate sections of Ch. 19 and the chapter never assembles them into a risk-factor list. Searched the week 5 deck and the webinar: no coverage of depression risk factors at all. The card also carries the chapter's negative finding — that primary depression generally shows normal thyroid function — because it prevents a plausible error.
Check it yourself: open McCance & Huether Ch. 19 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
There's no single 'risk factors for depression' list in the source material — this page pulls together scattered facts from across the chapter, grouped by theme, so you have them in one place.
This card is assembled, not quoted. No source held for this course gives a consolidated list of risk factors for depression — this material is drawn from four separate sections of the assigned chapter, and there is no slide or webinar coverage of it at all. It's real, correctly attributed material; it's just never packaged anywhere as "risk factors", so a question phrased that way may be drawing on something outside this course's reading.
The numbers, grouped by theme
Number
What it is
62% monozygotic, 28% dizygotic
Twin concordance for unipolar depression (identical vs. fraternal twins)
16.2%
Lifetime prevalence of depression in the United States
Twofold
Greater risk in women than in men, after adolescence
2% to 6%
Share of children and adolescents affected
30% to 70%
People with major depression who show chronic activation of the HPA system (the stress-hormone axis) with elevated glucocorticoid (cortisol-type hormone) secretion
73,131
Danish individuals in a study where higher C-reactive protein (a blood marker of inflammation) was linked to a greater risk of psychological distress and depression
At least 50%, rising to approximately 80%
How often a first depressive episode recurs (at least 50%), and how that risk rises after two episodes (approximately 80%)
Adoptees whose biological family had a history of mood disorders develop major depression or manic-depressive illness more often than control adoptees — a finding that separates inherited risk from how someone was raised. But the textbook adds a caution: symptoms vary so much from person to person that developmental and environmental factors are considered just as important as genetic ones.
What else adds to risk
Uncontrollable stress interacting with genetic factors is how the textbook frames risk building up — and separately, an inability to cope with stressors, inflexible psychosocial and emotional skills, and poor physical health all add to it
Inflammation is described as a risk factor that triggers the onset of depression
Low social support and feeling lonely predict a worse response to treatment, dropping out of treatment early, and a higher chance of relapse
One negative finding worth keeping, because it prevents a mistake: thyroid problems can produce depression-like symptoms, but people diagnosed with primary depression generally have normal thyroid function. A normal thyroid test (TSH) doesn't rule depression in or out.
This card is assembled, not quoted. No source held for this course gives a consolidated list of risk factors for depression — the material below is drawn from four separate sections of the assigned chapter, and there is no slide or webinar coverage of it at all. It is real material, correctly attributed; it is just not packaged anywhere as "risk factors", so a question phrased that way may be drawing on something outside this course's reading.
Genetic and familial:
Twin concordance for unipolar depression: 62% monozygotic, 28% dizygotic
Adoptees with a biological family history of mood disorders have a higher incidence of major depression or manic-depressive illness than control adoptees — which separates inheritance from upbringing
The textbook adds a caution: the large variation in clinical symptoms suggests developmental and environmental factors are as important as genetic factors
Demographic:
Lifetime prevalence in the United States: 16.2%
A twofold greater risk in women than in men after adolescence
2% to 6% of children and adolescents
Stress and neuroendocrine:
Chronic stress-induced activation of the HPA system with elevated glucocorticoid secretion is found in 30% to 70% of people with major depression
Uncontrollable stress interacting with genetic factors is the textbook's framing of how risk accumulates
An individual's inability to cope with stressors, inexperience with flexible psychosocial and emotional skills, and lack of physical health all contribute
Inflammation:
Inflammation is described as a risk factor that triggers the onset of depression
In a study of 73,131 Danish individuals, elevated C-reactive protein was associated with increased risk of psychologic distress and depression
Social and course-related:
Low social support and perceived loneliness predict poor response to treatment, early drop-out and heightened risk of relapse
Prior episodes: at least 50% of people who recover from a first episode will experience another; the recurrence rate rises to approximately 80% in those with a history of two episodes
One negative finding worth keeping, because it prevents an error: although thyroid dysfunction can produce depressive features, people diagnosed with primary depression generally have normal thyroid function. A normal TSH does not rule depression in or out.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookMcCance & Huether Ch. 19 — mood disorder etiology, HPA dysregulation, Depression treatment, and the prevalence paragraph
Twin concordance of 62% and 28% and the adoptee finding; lifetime prevalence 16.2% with twice the risk in women; HPA activation with elevated glucocorticoids in 30–70%; raised CRP in a 73,131-person study; low social support predicting relapse; recurrence 50% then 80%.
Only part of this card is covered by the sources listed. The rest is not yet backed by anything we hold.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Neuroendocrine dysregulation and depression
✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
The direction of the HPA association — normalisation predicting response, persistence predicting relapse — was checked, since the card leans on it. The cross-reference the card makes to week 6 slide 19 is real: the endocrine deck asks this as a multiple-choice item and its answer is HPA hyperactivity with impaired feedback inhibition, which agrees with Ch. 19.
Check it yourself: open McCance & Huether Ch. 19 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
In depression, the body's stress-response system (the HPA axis) gets stuck in the 'on' position — cortisol stays high, and the switch that's supposed to turn it back off doesn't work properly.
The HPA axis (the stress-hormone system)
The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is the system that normally lets a person cope with stress
Long-term stress that keeps this system switched on, with high levels of cortisol-type hormones (glucocorticoids), is found in 30% to 70% of people with major depression
The direction matters: antidepressants that succeed in bringing the HPA axis back to normal go along with a good clinical response, while an HPA axis that stays dysregulated goes along with continued depression or relapse
This is treated as a high-yield, directly tested point. In major depression the HPA axis shows hyperactivity with impaired feedback inhibition — meaning cortisol stays elevated and the stress response runs on too long. It is not adrenal insufficiency, not enhanced feedback sensitivity, and not normal function.
The immune system runs alongside it
Psychosocial stress activates the immune system and raises proinflammatory chemical messengers (cytokines) — IL-1α, IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-6
Those cytokines act throughout the body and brain, and they further increase HPA hormone secretion and affect monoamine metabolism — so the stress axis and the inflammatory response feed each other
The thyroid axis (HPT)
Hyperthyroidism (an overactive thyroid) often causes dysphoria, anxiety, irritability, emotional swings and trouble thinking clearly
Severe hypothyroidism (an underactive thyroid) can produce the features of major depression, along with apathy, slowed movement and dementia-like changes
But people diagnosed with primary depression generally have normal thyroid function — and exactly how altered thyroid secretion connects to depression is still not established
How the pieces connect in a patient: less serotonin, norepinephrine and dopamine leads to depressed mood and loss of pleasure; excess cortisol leads to fatigue and disturbed sleep; and a smaller hippocampus with an underactive prefrontal cortex leads to poor concentration and guilt.
Underneath all of this sits the monoamine hypothesis: the idea that a shortfall in brain norepinephrine, dopamine and/or serotonin is what causes depression — the opposite of mania, which is thought to come from too much of these same chemicals. The evidence is pharmacologic: depressed people have reduced monoamine breakdown products in their spinal fluid, and in people successfully treated with antidepressants, depleting tryptophan (the building block of serotonin) or blocking dopamine and norepinephrine production brings the depression rapidly back.
Exam bottom line: two mechanisms, and both are fair game. The HPA axis stays switched on (hyperactivity, impaired feedback, high cortisol) — that's the neuroendocrine picture. The monoamine hypothesis — too little norepinephrine, dopamine and/or serotonin — is the separate explanation for the mood symptoms themselves. Depression is described by both; don't collapse them into one.
One-sentence version: in depression the stress axis is stuck on — the HPA system is chronically activated, cortisol is elevated, and the negative feedback that should switch it off is impaired.
The HPA axis:
The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system is what lets a person cope with stress
Chronic stress-induced activation with elevated glucocorticoid secretion is found in 30% to 70% of people with major depression
The direction of the association is informative: antidepressant drugs that are effective in normalising the HPA system are associated with a good clinical response, whereas persistent HPA dysregulation is related to continued depression or relapse
The endocrine deck asks this as a question, so treat it as flagged. In major depressive disorder the HPA axis shows hyperactivity with impaired feedback inhibition — leading to elevated cortisol and a prolonged stress response. Not adrenal insufficiency, not enhanced feedback sensitivity, not normal function. Week 6 slide, week 5 topic.
The immune link that runs alongside it:
Psychosocial stress activates the immune system and increases secretion of proinflammatory cytokines — IL-1α, IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-6
These modulate signalling throughout the periphery and brain and augment further secretion of HPA hormones and monoamine metabolism — so the stress axis and the inflammatory response drive each other
The hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis:
Hyperthyroidism often produces dysphoria, anxiety, irritability, emotional lability and cognitive impairment
Severe hypothyroidism produces features of major depression, apathy, psychomotor slowing and dementia
But people diagnosed with primary depression generally have normal thyroid function, and the causal mechanism underlying altered thyroid secretion and depression remains to be determined
How this shows up in the patient. The week 5 case works it forward: reduced serotonin, norepinephrine and dopamine → depressed mood and anhedonia; cortisol excess → fatigue and sleep disturbance; reduced hippocampal volume and prefrontal cortex hypoactivity → poor concentration and guilt.
The monoamine hypothesis sits underneath all of this: a deficit in the concentration of brain norepinephrine, dopamine and/or serotonin as the underlying cause of depression — in contrast to mania, which is proposed to result from elevated monoamine concentrations. The supporting evidence is pharmacologic: reduced monoamine metabolites in the CSF of depressed people, and dietary depletion of tryptophan (the precursor of serotonin) or inhibition of dopamine and norepinephrine synthesis producing a rapid return to depression in people successfully treated with antidepressants.
Chronic stress-induced HPA activation with elevated glucocorticoids in 30% to 70% of major depression; antidepressants that normalise the axis associated with good response while persistence predicts relapse; IL-1α, IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-6; the thyroid axis in both directions.
◆SlidesWeek 5 deck, slide 58
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Principles of prescribing antidepressants
◐textbook
◐textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Only part of this concept is covered by that source.
PARTIAL, and stated on the card. Everything present was verified, including both safety rules and all six selection criteria. What is absent is absent everywhere in the held material: no titration schedule, no monitoring interval, no black-box warning, no discontinuation guidance in Ch. 19, either deck or either webinar. Slide 60 lists five of the six selection criteria and adds nothing else.
Check it yourself: open McCance & Huether Ch. 19 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
This card is short on purpose: your course gives very little on how to prescribe antidepressants, and the goal here is to know exactly what it does say — not to fill in gaps with outside knowledge.
Scope warning. The sources for this course give one paragraph plus a single slide on prescribing. There is no titration guidance, no monitoring schedule, no black-box warning and no discontinuation protocol anywhere in the assigned material. If you've learned those elsewhere, they're correct clinical knowledge — but they aren't from this course, and nothing on this card should be stretched to cover them.
What the sources do establish
Number
What it is
Approximately 80%
Depressed people who respond to antidepressant drugs, psychotherapy, or a combination of both
Approximately 50%
People who may not show a favourable response during initial treatment
10% to 20%
People who may still have symptoms after 2 years
2 months
How long a trial of one antidepressant runs before switching to a different one, if there's no response
50% to 80%
How often ECT relieves depressive symptoms
Choosing the first drug weighs the person's symptoms, their age, the drug's side effects, safety, cost and convenience. The textbook's example: a medication that causes sedation may be chosen on purpose to help with sleep disturbance. In other words, the symptom picture helps pick the drug — not the diagnosis alone.
When the first drug doesn't work
SSRIs are the standard first-line treatment for major depression
Adjunctive atypical antipsychotics — aripiprazole, brexpiprazole — are FDA-approved add-ons for treatment-resistant depression
ECT is used when someone fails to respond to medication, or is severely depressed, pregnant, suicidal or psychotic
Two hard safety rules, both explicit in the textbook. ① Never combine an SSRI with an MAOI, and never start one right after stopping an MAOI. Doing so can cause serotonin syndrome — agitation, an overdriven autonomic nervous system, abdominal pain, rigidity, a rising body temperature — and it can end in coma or death. ② SSRIs strongly block a group of liver enzymes (cytochrome P-450), so any other psychiatric drug taken alongside can build up to a dangerous blood level.
In bipolar depression, antidepressants can speed up cycling or trigger mania. SSRIs and bupropion are less likely to do this than MAOIs or TCAs — that's a rule for choosing a drug, not just a side effect to watch for.
Set expectations about relapse. Even the best available treatment — medication plus psychotherapy — still leaves at least half of those who recover from a first episode facing another one, and that figure climbs to 80% once someone has had two. Two things push it up: dropping out of therapy or stopping the drug, and thin social support with perceived loneliness.
Scope warning. The sources held for this course give one paragraph plus a single slide on prescribing. There is no titration guidance, no monitoring schedule, no black-box warning and no discontinuation protocol anywhere in the assigned material. If you have met those elsewhere, they are correct clinical knowledge but they are not from this course, and nothing on this card should be stretched to cover them.
What the sources do establish:
Approximately 80% of depressed persons will respond to antidepressant drugs, psychotherapy, or a combination of both
SSRIs are the standard first-line treatment for major depression
Selecting the initial antidepressant includes an assessment of: the person's symptoms, their age, the side effects, safety, cost and convenience of the medication
The worked example the textbook gives: medications that produce sedation may be helpful for the treatment of sleep disturbances. The symptom picture selects the drug, rather than the diagnosis selecting it.
When the first drug does not work:
Approximately 50% may not show a favourable response during initial treatment
10% to 20% may continue to exhibit symptoms after 2 years
If 2 months on one antidepressant produce no response, switching to a different one is the next step
Adjunctive atypical antipsychotics — aripiprazole, brexpiprazole — are FDA approved for treatment-resistant depression
ECT may be used when individuals fail to respond, or when they are severely depressed, pregnant, suicidal or psychotic; it relieves depressive symptoms in about 50% to 80%
Two hard safety rules, both explicit in the textbook. ① Never combine an SSRI with an MAOI, and never start one straight after stopping an MAOI. The result can be serotonin syndrome — agitation or autonomic overdrive, abdominal pain, rigidity, a rising temperature — and it can end in coma or death. ② SSRIs strongly inhibit cytochrome P-450 isoenzymes, so any other psychiatric drug taken alongside can climb to a dangerous blood level.
In bipolar depression, antidepressants may cause cycle acceleration or induce mania. SSRIs and bupropion are less likely to do this than MAOIs or TCAs — which is a prescribing principle, not a side effect.
Set expectations about relapse. Best-available treatment — medication plus psychotherapy — still leaves at least half of those who recover from a first episode facing another one, and that figure climbs to 80% once someone has had two. Two things push it up: dropping out of therapy or stopping the drug, and thin social support with perceived loneliness.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookMcCance & Huether Ch. 19 — Depression, Treatment; and the SSRI/MAOI interaction paragraph
About 80% respond to drugs, therapy or both; SSRIs first-line; selection on symptoms, age, side effects, safety, cost and convenience; about 50% not responding initially, with a switch after 2 months; SSRIs never with or after MAOIs; SSRIs as potent CYP-450 inhibitors.
◆SlidesWeek 5 deck, slide 60
Only part of this card is covered by the sources listed. The rest is not yet backed by anything we hold.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Side effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)
✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
The comparison table was built from this paragraph and checked class by class. Slide 60 carries the heading 'Side effects SSRIs' with no bullets under it, so the textbook alone carries this card — the card says so. Every tyramine-rich food on the list was verified against the chapter, as was the older-adult TCA preference.
Check it yourself: open McCance & Huether Ch. 19 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
SSRIs mainly cause insomnia and nausea — and their real selling point is what they don't do: unlike older antidepressants, they barely touch the heart or the drying-out (anticholinergic) side effects.
SSRI side effects
Sign
How common
Insomnia (sleep disturbance)
Common
Nausea
Common
Agitation
Also reported
Allergic skin reactions
Also reported
Dry mouth
Also reported
Anxiety
Also reported
Altered appetite
Also reported
Sexual dysfunction
Also reported
What SSRIs don't do is the real distinguishing feature. MAOIs and TCAs both act noticeably on the heart and on cholinergic transmission (the nerve signalling controlled by acetylcholine); SSRIs mostly leave both of those alone. That absence is why SSRIs became first-line — and it's the single most likely thing an exam question turns on.
MAOIs
TCAs
SSRIs
Sedation
Sedation or agitation
Sedation
Not pronounced
Sleep
Insomnia
Insomnia
Insomnia — common
GI
Dry mouth
Constipation, dry mouth
Nausea — common; dry mouth, altered appetite
Cardiovascular
Hypertensive crisis with tyramine-rich foods
Orthostatic hypotension
No pronounced cardiovascular effect
Anticholinergic
—
Moderate — urinary hesitancy or retention, blurred vision, memory impairment
No pronounced cholinergic effect
Neurologic
—
Seizures
Agitation, anxiety
Weight
Weight gain
Weight gain
Altered appetite
Sexual
Impotence
—
Sexual dysfunction
MAOI food and drug interactions — why MAOIs are used less often
Tyramine-rich foods can send blood pressure sharply up — a hypertensive crisis. Foods named in the chapter: aged cheese, sour cream, broad bean pods, pickled herring, liver, canned figs, raisins, avocado.
Four drug groups must be kept away from an MAOI: TCAs, SSRIs, stimulants, and over-the-counter flu remedies
In older adults, a TCA's anticholinergic load is the main problem (dry mouth, blurred vision, urinary retention, memory trouble). Where a TCA is still wanted, desipramine and nortriptyline are the usual choices, because they're lighter on all three fronts — anticholinergic, cardiac and sedating.
For the atypical antidepressants: expect sedation, dry mouth, weight gain and constipation. Liver toxicity has been reported with nefazodone and trazodone. Venlafaxine and reboxetine escape most of what makes TCAs risky, though they can still cause sweating, a dry mouth and some drowsiness.
If a question contrasts these three drug classes, anchor on this: MAOIs risk a hypertensive crisis with tyramine-rich foods. TCAs are the ones with the cardiac and anticholinergic load — orthostatic hypotension, urinary retention, blurred vision, memory trouble, and seizures. SSRIs are defined by what they lack: no pronounced cardiovascular effect and no pronounced cholinergic effect. That absence is why they became first-line, and it is the most likely thing an item turns on.
Source note. The week 5 slide on this topic is a bare heading with no bullets under it. The textbook alone carries the substance of this card.
Common SSRI side effects:
Sleep disturbances — insomnia
Nausea
Also reported:
Agitation
Allergic skin reactions
Dry mouth
Anxiety
Altered appetite
Sexual dysfunction
What SSRIs do not do is the distinguishing feature. Where MAOIs and TCAs act noticeably on the heart and on cholinergic transmission, SSRIs largely leave both alone. That absence is why they became first-line, and it is the most likely thing an exam item turns on.
MAOIs
TCAs
SSRIs
Sedation
Sedation or agitation
Sedation
Not pronounced
Sleep
Insomnia
Insomnia
Insomnia — common
GI
Dry mouth
Constipation, dry mouth
Nausea — common; dry mouth, altered appetite
Cardiovascular
Hypertensive crisis with tyramine-rich foods
Orthostatic hypotension
No pronounced cardiovascular effect
Anticholinergic
—
Moderate — urinary hesitancy or retention, blurred vision, memory impairment
No pronounced cholinergic effect
Neurologic
—
Seizures
Agitation, anxiety
Weight
Weight gain
Weight gain
Altered appetite
Sexual
Impotence
—
Sexual dysfunction
The MAOI food and drug interactions, since they are the reason MAOIs are used less often:
Tyramine-rich foods send the blood pressure sharply up — a hypertensive crisis. The foods named in the chapter: aged cheese; sour cream; broad bean pods; pickled herring; liver; canned figs; raisins; avocado.
Four drug groups must be kept away from an MAOI — TCAs, SSRIs, stimulants, and over-the-counter flu remedies
A geriatric point on TCAs: the anticholinergic load is the problem in older adults. Where a TCA is still wanted, desipramine and nortriptyline are the usual choices, being lighter on all three fronts — anticholinergic, cardiac and sedating.
And on the atypicals: expect sedation, dry mouth, weight gain, constipation. Liver toxicity has been reported with nefazodone and trazodone. Venlafaxine and reboxetine escape most of what makes TCAs dangerous, though they can still cause sweating, a dry mouth and some drowsiness.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookMcCance & Huether Ch. 19 — antidepressant side effects, following Table 19.2
SSRI insomnia and nausea as the common effects, with sexual dysfunction; SSRIs lacking pronounced cardiovascular or cholinergic effects unlike MAOIs and TCAs; the MAOI tyramine list; TCA seizures and anticholinergic load, with desipramine and nortriptyline preferred in older adults.
◆SlidesWeek 5 deck, slide 60
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Treatment of bipolar disorders (pharmacological and nonpharmacological)
✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Every drug name checked against the chapter. The card's organising claim — that medication alone does not prevent recurrence — is the chapter's own finding, verified. Slide 64 lists only the non-pharmacologic half; slides 61 and 77 carry the drugs, so the deck does cover both, just not on one slide.
Check it yourself: open McCance & Huether Ch. 19 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Bipolar disorder needs medication and therapy together — medication alone doesn't reliably keep episodes from coming back.
The organizing principle for this whole card: medication alone is not effective at preventing bipolar disorder from recurring. Medication plus psychosocial treatment reduces how often episodes come back and builds coping and symptom-management skills. If an answer choice offers medication as the complete treatment, it's wrong on this course's material.
Clozapine, risperidone, ziprasidone, quetiapine — many people are prescribed these as outpatients. (Quetiapine and olanzapine are the two the slides name.)
ECT
Reserved for three situations: medication hasn't worked, the patient is pregnant, or there's cardiovascular disease
An honest gap the textbook states directly: the comparative effectiveness of mood stabilizers and antidepressants versus second-generation antipsychotics in bipolar disorder remains unknown. The drugs themselves are well established — how they rank against each other is not.
Nonpharmacologic treatment
Cognitive behavioural therapy
Psychoeducation
Family-focused therapy
Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy
Integrated collaborative care
Ongoing monitoring for suicidality and medication adherence
How treatment is delivered changes whether people stick with it. People with bipolar disorder are more likely to continue combined treatment when it's delivered in family or group formats, or as brief psychoeducation — compared with formalised, individual psychoeducation in an outpatient setting.
The trap: treating the depressive phase with an antidepressant alone. Doing that risks speeding up how fast episodes cycle, or tipping the person into mania. SSRIs and bupropion carry less of that risk than MAOIs or TCAs — but less risk is not no risk, which is why getting mood stabilised comes first.
A pediatric caution. Bipolar II and ADHD look alike — both involve high activity, excessive talking, restlessness and being easily distracted. Misdiagnosing bipolar II as ADHD has a real consequence: the stimulant drugs used for ADHD can make bipolar II symptoms worse. That's part of why DSM-5 added disruptive mood dysregulation disorder for children aged 6 to 10 with frequent temper outbursts, irritability and bad moods — to keep them from being mislabeled as bipolar and put on strong medications they don't need.
The principle that organises this card: pharmacotherapy alone is not effective in preventing the recurrences of bipolar disorder. Medication plus psychosocial intervention reduces episode recurrences and builds symptom-management and coping skills. If an option offers medication as complete treatment, it is wrong on this course's material.
Pharmacologic:
Lithium — individuals with bipolar I are treated with lithium, and in some cases with SSRIs
Second-generation antipsychotics — clozapine, risperidone, ziprasidone, quetiapine; many individuals are prescribed these in an outpatient setting. The deck names quetiapine and olanzapine.
ECT — reserved for three situations: medication has not worked, the patient is pregnant, or there is cardiovascular disease
An honest gap the textbook states: the comparative effectiveness of mood stabilizers and antidepressants versus second-generation antipsychotics in individuals with bipolar disorder remains unknown. The drugs are established; the ranking between them is not.
Nonpharmacologic:
Cognitive behavioural therapy
Psychoeducation
Family-focused therapy
Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy
Integrated collaborative care
Monitor for suicidality and medication adherence
Format affects adherence, and the textbook is specific: individuals with bipolar disorder are more likely to continue combined treatment when it is delivered in family or group formats, or with brief psychoeducation — as opposed to formalised individual psychoeducation in an outpatient setting.
Antidepressants alone are the trap. Treat the depressive phase of bipolar disorder with an antidepressant and you risk speeding up the cycling, or tipping the patient into mania. SSRIs and bupropion carry less of that risk than MAOIs or TCAs — but less is not none, which is why mood stabilisation comes first.
A pediatric caution. Bipolar II and ADHD share elevated behavioural activity, excessive talking, restlessness and distractibility. Misdiagnosing bipolar II as ADHD has real consequences: the stimulants used for ADHD can exacerbate the symptoms of a child with bipolar II. DSM-5 added disruptive mood dysregulation disorder for children aged 6 to 10 with frequent temper outbursts, irritability and bad moods, to keep them out of a bipolar diagnosis and off strong medications.
Lithium for bipolar I; carbamazepine, valproate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate; the four second-generation antipsychotics with comparative effectiveness stated as unknown; ECT for non-response, pregnancy or cardiovascular disease; medication alone not preventing recurrence.
◆SlidesWeek 5 deck, slide 64
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Managing panic disorders
✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
The two FDA-approved-for-panic agents were checked by name, since that specificity is exactly what an item would turn on. The full benzodiazepine withdrawal sequence — anxiety, insomnia, photophobia, diarrhea — is the chapter's. Slide 65 adds stress management and sleep hygiene.
Check it yourself: open McCance & Huether Ch. 19 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Panic disorder responds well to treatment — up to 80% of people improve with CBT, medication, or both together.
What CBT actually does
Teaches the person that the bodily symptoms of panic won't kill them — and from there, to take back some control over the anxiety and the panic itself
Breathing exercises to control hyperventilation ease the intense physical symptoms — the racing heart and breathing rate
A side benefit: it builds awareness of whether the person is sticking with their medication
For mild agoraphobia, CBT alone may be effective
Medication
Drug / class
Role
SSRIs
First-line. Paroxetine and sertraline are FDA-approved specifically for panic disorder.
Venlafaxine (a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake blocker)
Also effective
Benzodiazepines — alprazolam, clonazepam
Used as adjunct/augmentation therapy for people who don't fully respond to SSRIs
Stress management and good sleep habits round out treatment alongside the medication and the therapy.
The benzodiazepine trade-off, in sequence. Short term: sedation, poor coordination (ataxia), and cognitive impairment. Longer-term use can lead to physical and psychological dependence. Stopping abruptly triggers a withdrawal syndrome — worse anxiety, insomnia, light sensitivity (photophobia) and diarrhea. The fix is a gradual reduction in the medication, or adding CBT to reduce reliance on the drug.
Up to 80% of individuals affected by panic disorder respond to CBT and antidepressant drugs — separately or in combination. That number is the headline: this is a treatable condition.
Cognitive behavioural therapy, and what it actually does:
The work is to learn that the bodily symptoms will not kill you, and from there to take some control of the anxiety and the panic
Breathing exercises to control hyperventilation lessen the intense physiologic symptoms — elevated heart and respiration rates
A further benefit is awareness of adherence with drug medications
For individuals with mild agoraphobia, CBT alone may be effective
Pharmacotherapy:
SSRIs are considered first-line.Paroxetine and sertraline have received FDA approval specifically for panic disorder.
Venlafaxine, a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake blocker, is also effective
Benzodiazepines — alprazolam, clonazepam — are other medications for treating panic disorder, and serve as adjunct or augmentation therapy for individuals who do not fully respond to SSRIs
The benzodiazepine problem, in the textbook's own sequence. Short-term effects: sedation, ataxia, cognitive impairment. Long-term treatment may lead to physiologic and psychologic dependence. Abrupt withdrawal induces a withdrawal syndrome — heightened reemergence of anxiety, insomnia, photophobia and diarrhea. The mitigation is a gradual reduction in the medication, or adjunct CBT to reduce reliance.
Lifestyle measures from the deck: stress management and sleep hygiene, alongside the drug and the therapy.
Up to 80% responding to CBT and antidepressants; CBT teaching that the symptoms are not fatal, and effective alone for mild agoraphobia; SSRIs first-line with paroxetine and sertraline FDA-approved for panic disorder; benzodiazepine dependence and its withdrawal syndrome.
◆SlidesWeek 5 deck, slide 65
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Complications of panic disorders
◆slides
◆slides
Your instructor's own slide deck carries this, but nobody has checked it against the textbook yet. Not a lesser source — she writes the exam — just a different promise.
SLIDES-BACKED, and this is the one card in the unit where the deck outruns the book. Slide 65 lists all six complications — agoraphobia, depression, substance abuse, impaired social and occupational functioning, increased suicide risk, chronic anxiety — while Ch. 19 develops only agoraphobia. Scored as SLIDES rather than TEXTBOOK because the slides are what actually cover the assigned topic; the chapter was still read and supplies everything under the list.
Check it yourself: open McCance & Huether Ch. 19 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Where this card comes from, and it runs the other way from most of this unit. Here the slides carry the fuller list and the textbook backs only agoraphobia in detail. The six complications below are the instructor's list; the agoraphobia material under them is the textbook's.
Panic disorder rarely stays contained to just panic attacks — left untreated, it tends to spread into avoidance, other mental health problems, and impaired functioning.
The complications
Agoraphobia
Depression
Substance abuse
Impaired social and occupational functioning
Increased risk of suicide
Chronic anxiety
Agoraphobia is the one explained in depth. It's defined by what the person avoids: anywhere that getting out, or getting help, would be hard. In practice, that means staying home instead of going out, avoiding lines and crowds, and not travelling by train, plane or car. At its most severe, the person stops leaving the house at all.
Where the avoidance comes from. Panic attacks bring on intense physical symptoms — lightheadedness, a racing heart, difficulty breathing, chest discomfort, sweating all over, general weakness, trembling, stomach distress, chills or hot flashes. They start spontaneously and last from several minutes to an hour. Between attacks, the person worries about the next one, and fears losing control or dying. That fear of what might happen next — not the attack itself — is what drives the avoidance: the person starts steering clear of wherever an attack happened, and the avoidance keeps spreading.
This is also why CBT works the way it does: teaching that the physical symptoms aren't fatal attacks the anticipatory fear directly, rather than the attack itself — which is why mild agoraphobia may respond to CBT alone.
The exam discriminator for this card: of the six complications, agoraphobia is the one built out in detail — defined by avoiding anywhere that escape or help would be hard. If a question describes someone avoiding crowds, travel or leaving the house after panic attacks, that's agoraphobia as a complication of panic disorder.
Source note, and it runs the other way from most of this unit. Here the slides carry the fuller list and the textbook backs only agoraphobia in detail. The six complications below are the instructor's list; the agoraphobia material beneath them is the textbook's.
Complications of panic disorder:
Agoraphobia
Depression
Substance abuse
Impaired social and occupational functioning
Increased risk of suicide
Chronic anxiety
Agoraphobia is the one the textbook develops. It calls it a notable complication of panic disorder, and defines it by what the person steers clear of: anywhere that getting out, or getting help, would be hard. In practice that means staying home rather than going out, avoiding queues and crowds, and not travelling by train, plane or car. At the severe end the person stops leaving the house at all.
Where the avoidance comes from. Panic attacks involve intense autonomic arousal — lightheadedness, tachycardia, difficulty breathing, chest discomfort, generalised sweating, general weakness, trembling, abdominal distress, chills or hot flashes. Symptoms originally occur spontaneously and last from several minutes to an hour. Between attacks, the individual worries about future panic attacks and fears losing control and dying. That anticipatory fear is the engine: the person begins avoiding wherever an attack happened, and the avoidance spreads.
This is also why CBT works the way it does — teaching that the physical symptoms are not fatal attacks the anticipatory fear rather than the attack itself. And it is why mild agoraphobia may respond to CBT alone.
Develops agoraphobia in detail — avoidance of anywhere escape or help would be hard, of being away from home, of queues, crowds and travel, with severe cases housebound — plus the between-attack fear of losing control and dying. It does not give the other five complications.
◆SlidesWeek 5 deck, slide 65
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Pathophysiology of general anxiety disorder (GAS)
✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Both fMRI studies were re-read and the card's summary of each matches. The card presents the textbook's neurochemical account and the deck's amygdala/GABA/HPA account side by side and calls them complementary — checked, and they are: neither source denies the other's mechanism, they emphasise different levels of the same circuit. Not scored as a disagreement for that reason.
Check it yourself: open McCance & Huether Ch. 19 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
GAD is chronic, excessive worry about ordinary things — and the two halves of your course describe the same brain circuit from different angles: one names the chemicals, the other names the structures.
A note on the name, and how to read what follows. The school's topic list writes GAS; the disorder is actually generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Its hallmark is worry that is both excessive and unrelenting, aimed at ordinary things — a marriage, performance at work, health, money, or standing among other people. Two sources describe its biology from different angles, and they aren't in disagreement: the textbook emphasises norepinephrine, serotonin and benzodiazepine binding; the slides emphasise the amygdala, GABA and the HPA axis. Both could be tested, so both are below.
The textbook's account (chemistry)
Reduced α2-adrenergic receptor binding
Decreased serotonin levels in the spinal fluid (CSF)
Reduced platelet binding of paroxetine, an SSRI
Reduced benzodiazepine binding in the left temporal hemisphere
The slides' account (circuitry)
Hyperactivity of the amygdala together with a dysregulated prefrontal cortex — a heightened fear response
GABA deficiency — less inhibitory brake on anxiety circuits
Increased norepinephrine activity
HPA axis overactivation — a chronic stress response
Imaging findings that tie the two together
In adults with GAD, more anticipatory anxiety went along with higher cingulate cortex activity; after 8 weeks of venlafaxine, both the anxiety and the cingulate activity dropped — suggesting a drop in cingulate activity predicts how well treatment will work
In children and adolescents with GAD, briefly flashing a masked angry face drove up activity in the right amygdala — and the more anxious the child, the bigger that response, which shows up as abnormal threat vigilance
Genetics and epidemiology: twin studies in women show concordance around 30% — real heritability — with no specific disease gene on a particular chromosome identified. Lifetime prevalence is 4.1% to 6.6%, somewhat higher in women. It usually first appears in the early twenties, though it can start in childhood. Severity rises and falls with whatever stressors are current; the disorder tends to be chronic, though symptoms may ease with age. Substance abuse is a frequent complication — people self-medicate the anxiety with alcohol or drugs.
As a group, anxiety disorders are the most common psychiatric illness there is — somewhere between 10% and 30% of the population. Many of those people also have symptoms of major depression, and the overlap is large enough that a shared underlying brain basis has been proposed.
Exam bottom line: know the name is GAD (not GAS); know that the textbook's chemistry (norepinephrine, serotonin, benzodiazepine binding) and the slides' circuitry (amygdala, GABA, HPA axis) describe the same disorder from two angles; and know the prevalence figure — 4.1% to 6.6% — as the number most likely to be tested directly.
A note on the name. The school's topic list writes GAS; the disorder is generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Worry that is both excessive and unrelenting is the hallmark, and its targets are ordinary: a marriage, performance at work, health, money, standing among other people.
The sources emphasise different halves of the same circuit. The textbook stresses norepinephrine, serotonin and benzodiazepine binding; the slides stress the amygdala, GABA and the HPA axis. These are complementary descriptions, not a disagreement — but both may be tested, so both are here.
Neurochemistry — the textbook's account:
Reduction in α2-adrenergic receptor binding
Decreased serotonin levels in CSF
Reduced platelet binding of paroxetine, an SSRI
Reduction of benzodiazepine binding in the left temporal hemisphere
Circuitry — the deck's account:
Hyperactivity of the amygdala and dysregulation of the prefrontal cortex — a heightened fear response
GABA deficiency — reduced inhibitory control over anxiety circuits
Increased norepinephrine activity
HPA axis overactivation — a chronic stress response
Imaging findings, which tie the two accounts together:
In adults with GAD, increased anticipatory anxiety was associated with elevated cingulate cortex activity; both the anxiety and the cingulate activation were reduced after 8 weeks of venlafaxine. This suggests a decrease in cingulate activity predicts treatment efficacy.
Among children and adolescents with the disorder, a brief flash of a masked angry face drove up activity in the right amygdala, and the more anxious the child, the bigger that response — which is abnormal amygdala activity showing up as threat vigilance.
Genetics: twin studies in women put concordance around 30% — real heritability — yet no chromosome-specific disease gene has been pinned down.
Epidemiology and course: lifetime prevalence 4.1% to 6.6%, somewhat higher in women. It usually appears in the early twenties, though it can start in childhood. Severity rises and falls, often with whatever the current stressors are; the disorder tends to be chronic, but symptoms may ease with age. Substance abuse is a frequent complication — people reach for alcohol or drugs to quiet the anxiety themselves.
As a group, anxiety disorders are the commonest psychiatric illness there is — somewhere between 10% and 30% of the population. Many of those people also carry symptoms of major depression, and the overlap is heavy enough that a shared neural basis has been proposed.
Reduced α2-adrenergic binding, decreased CSF serotonin, reduced platelet paroxetine binding and reduced benzodiazepine binding in the left temporal hemisphere; the adult cingulate finding after 8 weeks of venlafaxine; the child right-amygdala response; 30% twin concordance.
◆SlidesWeek 5 deck, slide 66
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Treatment of GAS
✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
The diagnostic threshold sits in the treatment section of the chapter rather than the pathophysiology section, which is why the card carries it here — verified in place. Buspirone's receptor target and its slower onset were both checked. The card's explanation of why benzodiazepines come last is the chapter's own reasoning, not ours.
Check it yourself: open McCance & Huether Ch. 19 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
GAD is diagnosed with a time-and-symptom-count rule, and treated in a set order — durable options first, with benzodiazepines held back as a short-term fallback because the disorder tends to last for years.
The diagnostic threshold. Two conditions have to both be met: excessive worry running for 6 months or more, and three or more of six core symptoms — restlessness, muscle tension, irritability, tiring easily, trouble concentrating, trouble sleeping.
First-line drugs
Drug / class
Notes
SNRIs — venlafaxine
Symptoms can start easing inside a week
SSRIs — paroxetine and escitalopram
Also treat the depression that so often comes along with GAD
Second option
Buspirone, which has an affinity for serotonin 5-HT1A receptors
Onset of clinical efficacy may take 2 weeks — slower than the SSRIs and SNRIs above
Main side effects — dizziness, headaches, nausea, mild nervousness — lessen over time
For non-responders:benzodiazepines are used for people who don't respond to SNRIs or buspirone. But because GAD tends to be chronic and often comorbid with depression or other anxiety disorders, benzodiazepines are usually limited to short-term use and uncomplicated cases.
Nonpharmacologic treatment
Behavioural therapy to acquire relaxation techniques that control anxiety
CBT for worry control and relaxation
Mindfulness and stress-reduction techniques, and exercise
The chronicity is the reason for the order. A condition that can last years shouldn't be managed long-term with a drug class that causes dependence — so the durable options come first, and the benzodiazepine stays a limited-term fallback.
Get the diagnostic threshold first, because the treatment section is where the book states it. Two conditions have to be met: excessive worry running for 6 months or more, and three or more of the six core symptoms — restlessness, muscle tension, irritability, tiring easily, trouble concentrating, trouble sleeping.
First-line therapeutics:
SNRIs — venlafaxine
SSRIs — paroxetine and escitalopram
Symptoms can start easing inside a week, and the same drugs also treat the depression that so often comes with it
Second option:
Buspirone, which has an affinity for serotonin 5-HT1A receptors
Onset of clinical efficacy may take 2 weeks — slower than the SSRIs and SNRIs above
Primary side effects, which lessen over time: dizziness, headaches, nausea, mild nervousness
For non-responders:
Benzodiazepines, for individuals who do not respond to SNRIs or buspirone
But because GAD tends to be chronic and comorbid with depression or other anxiety disorders, benzodiazepines are usually limited to short-term use and uncomplicated cases
Nonpharmacologic:
Behavioural therapy to acquire relaxation techniques that control anxiety
CBT for worry control and relaxation
Mindfulness and stress-reduction techniques; exercise
The chronicity is the reason for the sequencing. A condition that lasts years should not be managed with a drug class that produces dependence, so the durable options come first and the benzodiazepine is a limited-term fallback.
Diagnosis at 6 months of excessive worry with three of six symptoms; venlafaxine, paroxetine and escitalopram first-line, relief possible within a week; buspirone at 5-HT1A with a 2-week onset; benzodiazepines limited to short-term use because the disorder is chronic.
◆SlidesWeek 5 deck, slide 66
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Pathophysiology of schizophrenia
✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
The central claim — mesolimbic hyperdopaminergic driving positive symptoms while mesocortical hypodopaminergic drives negative and cognitive ones — was re-checked against the chapter, as was the PCP and ketamine evidence for the glutamate hypothesis. Every percentage on the card was verified individually. Slide 67 states the same dopamine split.
Check it yourself: open McCance & Huether Ch. 19 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Schizophrenia is a disorder of brain development where one dopamine pathway runs too HIGH and another runs too LOW — which is why a single drug can calm the hallucinations but do little for the flat, withdrawn symptoms.
The basics
Number
What it is
1%
How much of the world's population is affected — men and women equally
Late teens into the early twenties
Typical age of onset (arriving a little sooner in men)
30% to 50%
Concordance in identical (monozygotic) twins
12%
Concordance in fraternal (dizygotic) twins and siblings — still far above the 1% general-population rate
2% to 5% per year
Rate of accelerated grey-matter loss in early-onset adolescents, against 0% to 1% in healthy age-matched adolescents
It's not a simple genetic disorder. Several genes on different chromosomes are involved, and they show reduced penetrance — meaning a person can carry the disease genes without ever developing the illness. Candidate genes include dysbindin, neuregulin 1, and DISC1, though the traits involved are complex and these genes haven't always been directly implicated.
Prenatal and perinatal risk factors
Exposure to prenatal infection
Prenatal nutritional deficiencies
Perinatal complications — birth defects, lack of oxygen at birth (neonatal hypoxia)
Upbringing in an urban environment
The leading idea: early environmental factors interfere with brain development that's already genetically programmed, compromising how the brain is built and how it functions. An early brain defect may remain silent and not cause obvious problems until later development calls on those structures to do more — which is part of why a developmental disorder doesn't present until early adulthood.
Structural brain changes
Enlargement of the lateral and third ventricles (fluid-filled brain spaces), and widening of the frontocortical fissures and sulci — larger ventricles go along with cognitive impairment, negative symptoms, and a poorer response to treatment
Reduction in the thalamus, which may disrupt communication between the frontal cortex and the sensory/motor areas, plus reduction in temporal-lobe areas — the amygdala, hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus
Hippocampal volume loss in the first years of illness, accelerating after age 50, strongly associated with overall cognitive and socio-occupational decline
The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is hypoactive — blood flow and metabolism normally rise there during working-memory tasks, and in schizophrenia they don't
A sobering detail, and then the most testable idea in this unit. Cortical brain tissue has already been lost before a person ever seeks help, and the loss continues through the whole course of the illness, even while taking antipsychotics. The current dopamine hypothesis explains why one drug can't fix everything: MESOLIMBIC pathway: too much dopamine (HYPERdopaminergic) → POSITIVE symptoms (hallucinations, delusions). MESOCORTICAL pathway, in the prefrontal cortex: too little dopamine (HYPOdopaminergic) → NEGATIVE and COGNITIVE symptoms (apathy, cognitive decline). One pathway runs high, the other runs low.
The evidence for it: the clinical potency of first-generation antipsychotics (chlorpromazine, fluphenazine, haloperidol) tracks closely with their affinity for the dopamine D2 receptor
High doses of drugs that sharply increase dopamine transmission — levodopa, cocaine, amphetamine — can produce a schizophrenia-like psychosis, which is reversed by dopamine blockers
The glutamate hypothesis, which runs alongside it
Underactivation of glutamate NMDA receptors is thought to contribute to schizophrenia
CSF glutamate concentrations are reduced, with decreased glutamate synthesis in the cortex
In people without schizophrenia, blocking NMDA receptors with phencyclidine or ketamine brings on both positive and negative symptoms — something the dopamine hypothesis alone doesn't explain
Exam bottom line: this unit has two hypotheses, and they're not rivals — they cover different ground. The dopamine hypothesis (mesolimbic HIGH → positive symptoms; mesocortical LOW → negative/cognitive symptoms) explains why one drug can't do everything. The glutamate hypothesis — underactive NMDA receptors — explains a detail dopamine alone can't: blocking NMDA receptors with phencyclidine or ketamine in someone without schizophrenia brings on both positive and negative symptoms together.
One-sentence version: schizophrenia is a neurodevelopmental disorder in which dopamine transmission is too HIGH in one pathway and too LOW in another — which is why one drug cannot fix both halves of the illness.
Epidemiology: it affects 1% of people worldwide, men and women equally. Onset falls in young adulthood — the late teens into the early twenties — arriving a little sooner in men.
Genetic predisposition:
Monozygotic twin concordance 30% to 50%
Dizygotic twins and siblings 12% — still far above the 1% general-population figure
Not a simple genetic disorder. Several genes on different chromosomes are involved, and the genes show reduced penetrance — individuals carry the disease genes without manifesting the illness
Candidate genes: dysbindin, neuregulin 1, DISC1 — though the traits are complex and candidate genes have not always been directly implicated
The leading hypothesis is that early environmental factors interfere with genetically programmed neural development, compromising brain structure and function. An early brain defect may remain silent and not affect the individual dramatically until later development requires adaptive use of those structures — which is why a developmental disorder presents in early adulthood.
Neuroanatomic alterations:
Enlargement of the lateral and third ventricles; widening of frontocortical fissures and sulci
Individuals with ventricular enlargement exhibit cognitive impairment, negative symptoms, and respond poorly to treatment
Reduction in the thalamus — which may disrupt neurotransmission between frontal cortex and primary sensory and motor areas — and in temporal lobe areas including amygdala, hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus
Hippocampal volume loss in the first years of the illness, accelerating after age 50, strongly associated with global cognitive and socio-occupational impairment
Accelerated grey matter loss in early-onset adolescents: 2% to 5% annually, against 0% to 1% in age-matched healthy adolescents
The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is hypoactive — blood flow and metabolism normally rise during working memory processing, and do not in schizophrenia
A clinically sobering detail: cortical tissue has already been lost before the person ever presents for help, and the loss goes on through the whole course of the illness even while they take antipsychotics.
The dopamine hypothesis, current version — and this is the most testable idea in the unit.MESOLIMBIC pathway: HYPERdopaminergic → POSITIVE symptoms (hallucinations, delusions). MESOCORTICAL pathway: HYPOdopaminergic in the prefrontal cortex → NEGATIVE and COGNITIVE symptoms (apathy, cognitive decline). One pathway up, one pathway down. That is why a drug that blocks dopamine relieves the hallucinations and does little for the flat affect.
The evidence for it:
A strong positive correlation between the clinical potency of first-generation antipsychotics (chlorpromazine, fluphenazine, haloperidol) and their affinity for the dopamine D2 receptor
High doses of drugs that dramatically increase dopaminergic transmission — levodopa, cocaine, amphetamine — produce a schizophrenic-like psychosis, reversed by dopamine blockers
The glutamate hypothesis, which sits alongside it:
Underactivation of glutamate NMDA receptors contributes to schizophrenia
CSF glutamate concentrations are reduced, with decreased cortical glutamate synthesis
In unaffected individuals, blocking NMDA receptors with phencyclidine or ketamine facilitates BOTH positive and negative symptoms — which the dopamine hypothesis alone does not do
Sources for this card
✓TextbookMcCance & Huether Ch. 19 — Schizophrenia, Etiology and Pathophysiology
1% of the world's population, onset in the late teens and early twenties; 30–50% against 12% concordance; the prenatal and perinatal factors; ventricular enlargement, hippocampal loss, 2–5% annual grey matter loss, a hypoactive DLPFC; the dopamine split and the NMDA hypothesis.
◆SlidesWeek 5 deck, slide 67
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Positive signs of schizophrenia
✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Box 19.1 was checked item by item; every entry on the card appears there. The diagnostic rule was verified separately because the card builds its closing point on it — that negative symptoms alone cannot make the diagnosis, since one of the two required symptoms must be delusions, hallucinations or disorganized speech.
Check it yourself: open McCance & Huether Ch. 19 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
'Positive' doesn't mean good — it means something has been ADDED to the person's experience that shouldn't be there, like hearing voices or holding a false belief.
Say it plainly: 'positive' does not mean good. Positive symptoms are things present that should be absent — something added, like a hallucination or a delusion. Negative symptoms are things absent that should be present — something taken away, like normal emotional expression. Positive symptoms typically show up during a psychotic episode, when the person loses touch with reality.
Hallucinations — a perception with no actual sense-organ stimulation behind it; they can occur alone or together
Type
What it looks like
Auditory
Hearing voices — voices commenting on the person and voices conversing with each other are counted separately
Visual
Seeing images of animate or inanimate objects that aren't there
Somatic-tactile
Experiencing touch or electrical sensations with no cause
Olfactory and gustatory
Unpleasant smells or tastes that aren't there
Delusions — a persistent belief contrary to the person's educational and cultural background
Type
What it looks like
Persecutory and paranoid
Believing they're being spied on, conspired against, persecuted or ridiculed
Grandiosity; guilt; religious; somatic
False beliefs about one's own importance, wrongdoing, spiritual role, or body
Being controlled, mind-read, or referenced
Believing one's actions are controlled from outside, that others can read their mind, or that unrelated events are about them
Thought broadcasting, insertion, withdrawal
Believing one's thoughts are being broadcast to others, placed into their head, or pulled out of it
Referential delusions
Personalizing ordinary events — the textbook's example is believing a television talk-show host is directing information specifically at them
Disorganized speech (positive formal thought disorder) — fluent speech that's hard to follow
Type
What it looks like
Derailment and loose associations
Moving from one topic to another unexpectedly and illogically
Answers drift off-topic, take the long way around, don't follow logically, or don't make sense
Pressure of speech; distractible speech
Talking rapidly and urgently; becoming easily distracted while talking
Poverty of content
A fair amount of spoken words that convey little information — the same phrases repeated throughout a conversation
Bizarre behavior — the conceptual equivalent of disorganized speech, but in actions
Type
What it looks like
Aggressive, agitated
Hostility or agitation
Clothing and appearance; poor personal hygiene
Repetitive, stereotyped
The textbook's example is stereotyped rocking; also aimless behaviour
Social and sexual behaviour
Behaviour that's inappropriate for the setting
Incongruity of affect
Emotion that doesn't fit the situation — hostility without provocation, or child-like silliness in sober situations
Difficulty engaging in goal-directed activities
For contrast, the negative symptoms — deficits, not additions: affective flattening (near absence of emotional or facial expression), anhedonia (unable to experience pleasure or pain, with a sense of detachment), alogia (absence of spontaneous speech), and avolition (a deficit in spontaneous or goal-directed behaviour, such as completing simple daily tasks).
The DSM-5 diagnostic rule, which is where the positive symptoms earn their weight.Two or more of: (1) delusions, (2) hallucinations, (3) disorganized speech, (4) disorganized or catatonic behaviour, (5) negative symptoms. They must be present for the greater part of one month, against a background of some disturbance across six months. And one of the two has to come from the first three — delusions, hallucinations or disorganized speech. Negative symptoms on their own cannot make the diagnosis.
"Positive" does not mean good. Positive symptoms are things present that should be absent — something added. Negative symptoms are things absent that should be present — something taken away. Positive symptoms frequently occur during a psychotic episode, when the individual loses touch with reality.
HALLUCINATIONS — a perception experienced without external stimulation of the sense organs:
Auditory — hearing voices; voices commenting and voices conversing are listed separately
Visual — images of animate and inanimate objects
Somatic-tactile — experiencing touch or electrical sensations
Olfactory and gustatory — unpleasant odours or tastes
They may occur alone or together
DELUSIONS — a persistent belief contrary to the educational and cultural background of the individual:
Persecutory and paranoid — spying, conspiracy, persecution, ridicule
Grandiosity; guilt; religious; somatic
Delusions of being controlled, of mind reading, of reference
Thought broadcasting, thought insertion, thought withdrawal
Referential delusions personalise ordinary stimuli — the textbook's example is believing a television talk show host is directing information specifically at them
POSITIVE FORMAL THOUGHT DISORDER / DISORGANIZED SPEECH — fluent speech that is difficult to comprehend:
Derailment and loose associations — moving from one topic to another unexpectedly and illogically
Pressure of speech; distractible speech — becoming easily distracted while talking
Poverty of content — a fair amount of spoken words conveying little information, the same phrases repeated throughout a conversation
BIZARRE BEHAVIOR — the conceptual equivalent of disorganized speech:
Aggressive, agitated
Clothing and appearance; poor personal hygiene
Repetitive, stereotyped — the textbook's example is stereotyped rocking; also aimless behaviour
Social and sexual behaviour
Incongruity of affect — inappropriate situational affect, such as hostility without provocation or child-like silliness in sober situations
Difficulty engaging in goal-directed activities
For contrast, the negative dimensions — deficits in normal functioning: affective flattening (near absence of emotional or facial expression), anhedonia (unable to experience pleasure or pain, with a sense of detachment), alogia (absence of spontaneous speech), and avolition (a deficit in spontaneous or goal-directed behaviour, such as completing simple daily tasks).
The DSM-5 diagnostic rule, which is where the positive symptoms earn their weight.Two or more of: (1) delusions, (2) hallucinations, (3) disorganized speech, (4) disorganized or catatonic behaviour, (5) negative symptoms. They must be there for the greater part of one month, against a background of some disturbance across six months. And one of the two has to come from the first three — delusions, hallucinations or disorganized speech. Negative symptoms on their own cannot make the diagnosis.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookMcCance & Huether Ch. 19 — Box 19.1 Major Symptoms of Schizophrenia; Psychotic Dimension; Disorganized Behavior
Box 19.1's four positive groupings with their members — hallucinations by modality, the eleven delusion types, the seven forms of thought disorder, and bizarre behaviour — plus the DSM-5 rule of two of five over a month, one from the first three, with disturbance across six.
◆SlidesWeek 5 deck, slide 67
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Symptoms of a manic episode
✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
The threshold rule including the irritable-mood exception was checked against Box 19.2. The bipolar I versus II distinction — one manic episode against a two-week depressive plus a four-day hypomanic episode — was verified, along with bipolar I occurring equally by sex while bipolar II affects more women. Slide 63's manic symptom list agrees with the box.
Check it yourself: open McCance & Huether Ch. 19 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
A manic episode is diagnosed the same way depression is — by counting symptoms against a time threshold — and it's the deciding feature that separates bipolar I from bipolar II.
The threshold. A distinct stretch of at least a week in which mood is abnormally and persistently elevated, expansive or irritable, carrying three or more of the symptoms below — four are required if irritability is the only mood change present.
The nine symptoms
Elevated mood
Irritable mood
Inflated self-esteem
Decreased need for sleep
Excessive talking
Racing / crowded thoughts
Distractibility
Increase in goal-directed activity
Excessive risky activities
What that actually looks like
Elevated euphoria and self-esteem, with feelings of grandiosity
Energy is greatly enhanced after only a few hours of sleep each night — but the increased energy does not lead to organised plans and thoughts
Poor judgement in spending money, becoming hypersexual, making poor business commitments
Excessive, rapid, loud and pressured speech, skipping from one topic of conversation to another
Easily distracted, both when speaking and when performing tasks
Also hyperactivity and agitation
Approximately 50% of manic individuals develop psychotic symptoms — delusions or hallucinations — which require hospitalisation. Mania can significantly impair the individual and trigger psychosis.
Course: mania tends to switch on and switch off abruptly, running anywhere from days to months, and a depressive phase typically follows it. Recurrence risk is high, and higher still when treatment is delayed.
Bipolar I vs. bipolar II — the deciding feature
Bipolar I
Bipolar II
Defining episode
At least one MANIC episode, which may be preceded or followed by hypomanic or major depressive episodes
A major depressive episode lasting 2 weeks or more, AND a hypomanic episode of 4 days or more
Sex distribution
Occurs equally in men and women
Affects more women than men
Prevalence of bipolar disorder runs 3% to 5% of the general population, with twin concordance reaching 62% in monozygotic and 42% in dizygotic pairs. Leave either mood disorder untreated and physical illness follows for a proportion of patients — cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes, thyroid disease.
The deciding feature between bipolar I and bipolar II is the episode, not the mood. Bipolar I requires at least one manic episode. Bipolar II never has a manic episode — it requires a major depressive episode of 2 weeks or more plus a hypomanic episode of 4 days or more. If a question describes a full manic episode, that's bipolar I; if it describes a hypomanic episode alongside a major depressive episode, that's bipolar II. How severe the presentation looks is not the test — the type of episode is.
The threshold. A distinct stretch of at least a week in which mood is abnormally and persistently elevated, expansive or irritable, carrying three or more of the symptoms below — four are required if irritability is the only mood change.
The symptoms, as the textbook lists them:
Elevated mood
Irritable mood
Inflated self-esteem
Decreased need for sleep
Excessive talking
Racing / crowded thoughts
Distractibility
Increase in goal-directed activity
Excessive risky activities
What it looks like:
Elevated euphoria and self-esteem, and feelings of grandiosity
Energy greatly enhanced after only a few hours of sleep each night — but the increased energy does not lead to organised plans and thoughts
Poor judgement in spending money, becoming hypersexual, making poor business commitments
Excessive, rapid, loud and pressured speech; skipping from one topic of conversation to another
Easily distracted both when speaking and when performing tasks
The deck adds hyperactivity and agitation
Approximately 50% of manic individuals develop psychotic symptoms — delusions or hallucinations — which require hospitalisation. Mania symptoms may significantly impair the individual and trigger psychosis.
Course: mania tends to switch on and switch off abruptly, running anywhere from days to months, and a depressive phase typically follows it. Recurrence risk is high, and higher still when treatment is delayed.
BIPOLAR I
BIPOLAR II
Defining episode
At least one MANIC episode, which may be preceded or followed by hypomanic or major depressive episodes
A major depressive episode lasting 2 weeks or more, AND a hypomanic episode of 4 days or more
Sex distribution
Occurs equally in men and women
Afflicts more women than men
Prevalence of bipolar disorder runs 3% to 5% of the general population, with twin concordance reaching 62% in monozygotic and 42% in dizygotic pairs. Leave either mood disorder untreated and physical illness follows for a proportion of patients — cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes, thyroid disease.
Box 19.2's nine manic symptoms with the three-or-more threshold, four if the mood is only irritable, over at least a week; energy after little sleep that does not produce organised plans; psychosis in about 50%; abrupt onset and offset; the bipolar I and II definitions.
◆SlidesWeek 5 deck, slide 63
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.