All five assigned chapters are in the folder and every card is backed by them. This is the only unit with NO deck and NO usable webinar — week 4's PowerPoint was never uploaded, and the recording in that folder is a different course's board-prep session. So these cards rest on the textbook and the course module alone.
The percentage is how much has been LOOKED UP, not how much is correct. To check a single card, open its badge — it names the chapter or slide behind that card.
Ch. 60, covering all four aspects the school lists. Two facts chosen for prominence because they are counterintuitive: adrenal recovery depends on DURATION rather than dose size, and a suppressed patient needs MORE steroid under stress rather than less. Week 4 has no deck, so nothing is cited from slides.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 59–63 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Steroids are not dangerous in themselves — how much and for how long is what does the damage. At replacement doses you see none of this, and even a big dose for a few days usually causes nothing.
What goes wrong with prolonged use: thinning bones that fracture (ribs and spine especially — sometimes within weeks on high doses), infections, fluid and salt problems, mood changes, cataracts and glaucoma, ulcers, and the puffy Cushing appearance. Bone loss is mostly a problem with tablets or injections — inhalers and creams rarely cause it, even long term.
The most dangerous one is adrenal suppression. Taking steroids tells the body to stop making its own, and eventually the adrenal glands shrink.
Recovery takes anywhere from 5 days to a year.
What decides that is how LONG they took it, not how much — which is the opposite of what most people assume.
This matters most in a crisis. Normally the adrenals pour out extra steroid during trauma or surgery, and that surge keeps people alive. Someone suppressed cannot do it — so give them MORE steroid when they are ill or having surgery, not less, and keep giving top-up doses for a while even after they stop.
With digoxin — steroids lower potassium, and low potassium makes digoxin dangerous.
With thiazide or loop water tablets — those lower potassium too, so it compounds.
With NSAIDs — both irritate the gut, so ulcers and bleeding become much likelier.
Never give them to someone with a fungal infection through the body, or to anyone having a live vaccine.
Outside hormone replacement, steroids are used for rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, inflammatory bowel disease, allergies, asthma and skin conditions.
Adverse effects follow dose size and duration — not the drug itself.
Administration:
These effects belong to pharmacologic dosing, not physiologic. At replacement doses they do not appear at all, and a short course — a few days or less — usually produces none of them even at a high dose. Intensity climbs with both the size of the dose and how long it runs.
Adverse reactions:
Osteoporosis with fractures — frequent and serious in prolonged systemic therapy, uncommon when inhaled or topical even long term. Ribs and vertebrae worst; vertebral compression fractures can occur within weeks on high doses. Watch for back and neck pain.
Adrenal suppression is perhaps the most dangerous effect of long-term therapy if not managed properly. Exogenous glucocorticoids suppress CRH and ACTH; the pituitary loses ACTH-making capacity and the adrenals atrophy. Recovery takes anywhere from 5 days to a year, and is determined primarily by DURATION of use — dosage size is less important.
Which is why stress matters: the adrenals normally surge glucocorticoids under trauma or surgery, and those are essential for supporting life. A suppressed patient cannot. Increase the dose at times of physiologic stress, and continue supplemental doses even after therapy has stopped.
Drug-drug interactions:
With
Why
Digoxin
Glucocorticoids cause hypokalaemia, which raises the risk of digoxin-induced dysrhythmias
Thiazide or loop diuretics
Also potassium-depleting — the hypokalaemia compounds
NSAIDs
Same GI effects as glucocorticoids, so ulceration and GI bleeding risk increases
Medication selection:
Contraindicated in systemic fungal infection, and in anyone receiving live virus vaccines. Uses in non-endocrine disorders include rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, inflammatory bowel disease, allergic conditions, asthma and dermatologic disorders.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch60 §Adverse effects
Effects occur at pharmacologic not physiologic doses, intensify with dose size and duration, and are mostly absent in brief treatment even at high dose.
✓TextbookLehne ch60 §Osteoporosis
Frequent and serious in prolonged systemic use but uncommon inhaled or topical; ribs and vertebrae worst; vertebral compression fractures within weeks on high doses; and the three causes.
✓TextbookLehne ch60 §Adrenal suppression
The most dangerous long-term effect if mismanaged; the CRH/ACTH suppression and adrenal atrophy; recovery from 5 days to a year determined primarily by duration rather than dose; and the need for increased doses under physiologic stress and supplemental doses after stopping.
✓TextbookLehne ch60 §Drug interactions
Caution with digoxin and with thiazide or loop diuretics because of hypokalaemia, and increased ulceration and GI bleeding risk with NSAIDs.
✓TextbookLehne ch60 §Contraindications
Contraindicated in systemic fungal infections and in patients receiving live virus vaccines.
▣Course modulemodule wk4 §Key Points
Places glucocorticoid therapy among the week's musculoskeletal and rheumatologic drugs.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
DMARD
Topic 53 of 67✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Ch. 61, covering both aspects. The three-way comparison is the chapter's own and is the highest-yield content: the distinction that NSAIDs do NOT slow progression while glucocorticoids DO is the reversal to guard. The 3-month window is the adjusting-treatment aspect.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 59–63 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
DMARD stands for disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, and the name is the point: these are the only ones that actually slow the disease down and stop joints being destroyed. They do it by interfering with the immune and inflammatory response.
Three kinds:
Conventional ones are small molecules made by ordinary chemistry, and they affect the immune system broadly — methotrexate is the main one.
Biologic ones are large molecules grown using DNA technology, and they target cytokines — the TNF inhibitors like adalimumab and etanercept.
Targeted ones are the newest: small synthetic molecules aimed at one specific thing, such as the JAK inhibitors.
How the three treatment groups compare is the thing worth being clear about:
NSAIDs relieve symptoms quickly but do nothing to stop the joints being damaged. They are the safest, so they need less monitoring.
Steroids relieve symptoms quickly and do slow the disease — but they are too toxic long term, so they are used in short bursts.
DMARDs are the ones that protect the joints.
Start a DMARD within 3 months of diagnosis. Started early enough, they can delay or even prevent serious joint damage — which is why rheumatoid arthritis is not treated by simply increasing painkillers.
The only group that reduces joint destruction and slows disease progression — which is what "disease-modifying" means.
MOA:
DMARDs work by interfering in immune and inflammatory responses. Three categories, distinguished by what they are made of and where they act:
Category
What it is
Acts on
Conventional (traditional)
Small molecules, synthesised by conventional chemistry
Extensive effects on the immune system
Biologic
Large molecules, made by recombinant DNA technology
Cytokines
Targeted
Synthetically developed small molecules — the newest category
A specific blocked target
Compare the three groups, because the exam question is which does what:
· NSAIDs — rapid symptom relief, do NOT prevent joint damage or slow progression. Safer than the other two, so less vigorous monitoring.
· Glucocorticoids — rapid relief AND slow progression, but serious long-term toxicity, so usually short courses only.
· DMARDs — reduce joint destruction and slow progression.
Adjusting treatment:
Start a DMARD EARLY — within 3 months of diagnosis for most patients. Instituted early, DMARD therapy can delay or even prevent serious joint injury. That is why RA is not managed by escalating painkillers: the window for preventing damage is at the beginning.
Conventional DMARDs include methotrexate, sulfasalazine, leflunomide and hydroxychloroquine. Biologics include the TNF inhibitors — adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab. Targeted DMARDs are the Janus kinase inhibitors, such as tofacitinib and upadacitinib.
Contrasts NSAIDs (rapid relief, no effect on joint damage or progression, safest, least monitoring), glucocorticoids (rapid relief plus slowed progression, but toxic long term so short courses) and DMARDs (reduce joint destruction); and defines the conventional, biologic and targeted categories.
✓TextbookLehne ch61 §Drug selection
Guidelines recommend starting a DMARD within 3 months of diagnosis for most patients, which can delay or prevent serious joint injury.
▣Course modulemodule wk4 §Drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Places DMARD therapy among the week's rheumatoid arthritis content.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Methotrexate adverse effects
Topic 54 of 67✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Ch. 61. The folic acid mechanism is included because it answers the obvious objection — why supplementing a folate antagonist with folate does not cancel the drug — and that is exactly the kind of question an exam asks. Note the book's own hedge that the RA mechanism is elusive.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 59–63 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Methotrexate is the first DMARD to reach for — it works, it is comparatively safe, and it is cheap. At least 8 in 10 people improve, and it acts faster than any other DMARD, in 3 to 6 weeks.
It blocks folate, which cells need to copy their DNA. In cancer that is clearly how it works; in rheumatoid arthritis the textbook admits the mechanism is not really understood, though it seems to come from damping down B and T lymphocytes.
Everyday side effects: nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, headache, tiredness — and a cough or breathing symptoms even when there is no infection.
The serious ones are different: liver scarring, bone marrow being shut down, ulcers in the gut, and inflammation of the lungs. So that cough is not something to wave away.
Give folic acid, at least 5 mg a week, to protect the gut and liver. It does not cancel the drug out, because it drifts into cells passively instead of competing with methotrexate.
Screen for TB before starting.
Check blood count, liver and kidneys first, then keep checking them — that monitoring is not optional.
The DMARD of first choice — efficacy, relative safety, low cost — and the fastest-acting of them all.
At least 80% of patients improve. Therapeutic effects may develop in 3 to 6 weeks, faster than any other DMARD. A folate antagonist: folate is needed for DNA synthesis and cell replication, so it inhibits both. That explains its mechanism in cancer — but in RA the exact mechanism is ELUSIVE. Benefit there appears to come from immunosuppression by reducing B and T lymphocyte activity.
Most common adverse effects:
Nausea
Vomiting
Diarrhoea
Headache
Fatigue
Cough and respiratory symptoms — even without infection
The major toxicities are different and much more serious: hepatic fibrosis, bone marrow suppression, GI ulceration, and pneumonitis. The cough above is not a minor complaint — respiratory symptoms on methotrexate need pneumonitis excluded.
Reducing the harm:
Give folic acid, at least 5 mg/week, to cut the GI and liver toxicity. It protects without blunting the drug because it drifts into cells passively, so it never competes with methotrexate for uptake.
Screen for tuberculosis BEFORE starting.
Baseline: complete blood count, liver and renal function.
After that, liver and kidney function must be rechecked periodically, along with blood cell and platelet counts. That monitoring is not optional.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch61 §Methotrexate
DMARD of first choice for efficacy, relative safety and low cost, at least 80% improve, fastest acting with effects in 3-6 weeks, a folate antagonist whose RA mechanism is elusive and appears to work by reducing B and T lymphocyte activity.
Names the common effects including cough without infection, the major toxicities of hepatic fibrosis, bone marrow suppression, GI ulceration and pneumonitis, folic acid at least 5 mg weekly entering cells passively without competing, TB screening before starting, and the baseline and mandatory periodic monitoring.
▣Course modulemodule wk4 §Drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Places methotrexate among the week's rheumatoid arthritis drugs.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Rheumatoid arthritis treatment selection
Topic 55 of 67✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Ch. 61. This card and the DMARD card overlap by design — the school lists both topics — so this one is organised around the SELECTION decision and the DMARD card around what the class is. The NSAID row is the trap: rapid relief and zero disease modification.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 59–63 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
The single most important rule: get a DMARD started within 3 months of diagnosis. Do it early enough and you can delay or even prevent the joints being wrecked. Wait, and that chance is gone.
That is why rheumatoid arthritis is not treated by simply turning up the painkillers.
NSAIDs make people feel better quickly and protect the joints not at all. They are the safest, so they need the least monitoring.
Steroids also work quickly, and they do slow the disease — but they are too toxic to keep going, so they are used in short bursts.
DMARDs are slower to work but they are what actually saves the joints.
Methotrexate is the one to start with — effective, comparatively safe, cheap, and quicker than any other DMARD at 3 to 6 weeks. Around 8 in 10 people improve on it.
If methotrexate is not enough, the other options are the biologics (large molecules that block cytokines, like the TNF inhibitors) and the newer targeted tablets such as the JAK inhibitors.
Two more things. DMARDs need the closest monitoring of the three — that is the price of the protection they give. And the biologics are more than the TNF inhibitors: rituximab, abatacept, and the IL-6 and IL-1 antagonists are all in that group.
Start a DMARD within 3 months of diagnosis — the window for preventing joint damage is at the beginning.
Started early, DMARD therapy can delay or even prevent serious joint injury. That is the organising principle: RA is not managed by escalating symptom relief.
What each group actually does:
Symptom relief
Slows progression?
Monitoring
NSAIDs
Rapid
No — and no prevention of joint damage
Safest of the three, so less vigorous
Glucocorticoids
Rapid
Yes
Serious long-term toxicity — usually short courses only
DMARDs
Slower
Yes — reduce joint destruction
Most vigorous
Methotrexate is the DMARD of first choice — efficacy, relative safety and low cost — and it acts faster than every other DMARD, with effects in 3 to 6 weeks. At least 80% of patients improve.
The three DMARD categories differ in kind: conventional small molecules with broad immune effects (methotrexate, sulfasalazine, leflunomide, hydroxychloroquine), biologic large molecules acting on cytokines (the TNF inhibitors, rituximab, abatacept, the IL-6 and IL-1 antagonists), and targeted synthetic small molecules such as the Janus kinase inhibitors.
So selection reads: start early, start with methotrexate unless there is a reason not to, use NSAIDs for symptoms knowing they protect nothing, and keep glucocorticoids short.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch61 §Drug selection
Start a DMARD within 3 months of diagnosis for most patients, which can delay or prevent serious joint injury.
Contrasts the three groups on speed of relief, effect on progression and monitoring burden, and defines the conventional, biologic and targeted DMARD categories with their members.
✓TextbookLehne ch61 §Methotrexate
Methotrexate is the DMARD of first choice, acts faster than all others with effects in 3-6 weeks, and at least 80% of patients improve.
▣Course modulemodule wk4 §Drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Places treatment selection among the week's rheumatoid arthritis content.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
NSAIDs contraindications
Topic 56 of 67✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Ch. 59's own summary of precautions and contraindications plus its life-span table. The card separates CONTRAINDICATED from EXTREME CAUTION from CAUTION because the book does and because collapsing them is what makes this topic get answered wrongly. Note the asthma/nasal-polyp cluster is caution, not contraindication, in this source.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 59–63 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Never give aspirin to someone with a peptic ulcer, a bleeding disorder such as haemophilia or vitamin K deficiency, or an allergy to aspirin or any other NSAID.
Never give any NSAID in the last three months of pregnancy — they can close the ductus arteriosus in the baby too early.
Be extremely careful in pregnancy generally, and in a child who has chickenpox or flu.
Ordinary caution covers a long list: older people, smokers, H. pylori infection, heart failure, cirrhosis, low blood volume, poor kidneys, asthma, hay fever, chronic hives, nasal polyps, and a history of problem drinking.
Stop aspirin a week before planned surgery, or a week before the due date.
And the paediatric rule everyone knows: because of Reye syndrome, no aspirin for infants, children or teenagers. Use paracetamol or ibuprofen for their fever instead.
Three absolute contraindications, and one whole trimester.
Aspirin is CONTRAINDICATED in:
Peptic ulcer disease
Bleeding disorders — haemophilia, vitamin K deficiency, hypoprothrombinaemia
Hypersensitivity to aspirin itself or to other NSAIDs
NSAIDs are contraindicated in the THIRD TRIMESTER of pregnancy, because they may cause premature closure of the ductus arteriosus.
Extreme caution:
Pregnant people
Children with chickenpox or influenza
Caution — a long list worth recognising rather than reciting:
Older adults · cigarette smokers · H. pylori infection · heart failure · hepatic cirrhosis · hypovolaemia · renal dysfunction · asthma, hay fever, chronic urticaria, nasal polyps · a history of alcohol use disorder.
Stop aspirin a week ahead of planned surgery, and a week before the expected delivery date.
Reye syndrome governs the paediatric rule: no aspirin for infants, children or adolescents. For their fever, small doses of acetaminophen or ibuprofen are safe alternatives.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch59 §Summary of precautions and contraindications
Names peptic ulcer disease, bleeding disorders and NSAID hypersensitivity as contraindications, extreme caution in pregnancy and in children with chickenpox or influenza, the full caution list, and withdrawal one week before elective surgery or anticipated childbirth.
✓TextbookLehne ch59 §Person-centered care across the life span: NSAIDs
Aspirin avoided in infants, children and adolescents because of Reye syndrome with acetaminophen and ibuprofen as alternatives, and NSAIDs contraindicated in the third trimester because of premature closure of the ductus arteriosus.
▣Course modulemodule wk4 §Key Points
Places NSAID safety among the week's prescribing considerations.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Meloxicam administration
Topic 57 of 67◐textbook
◐textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Only part of this concept is covered by that source.
PARTIAL. Ch. 59's dosage table gives meloxicam's maximum dose, half-life and approved indication, and the surrounding prose gives the class indications — but the paste has no meloxicam-specific administration passage beyond the table row, so the card works from the table and says what follows from it rather than inventing timing advice. The no-MI-protection contrast is the book's and is the trap on this topic.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 59–63 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Meloxicam is an ordinary older-style NSAID — it blocks both COX-1 and COX-2 — with one unusual feature: it hangs around in the body for 15 to 20 hours. Most of its relatives clear in 2 to 7.
That is why it is taken once a day: one dose keeps working all day. The maximum is 15 mg daily, and it is approved for arthritis.
The non-aspirin NSAIDs as a group are mainly for rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis, with some also used for fever, bursitis, tendinitis, moderate pain and period pain.
One thing not to assume: aspirin protects against heart attacks, and the other NSAIDs do not. That benefit belongs to aspirin alone.
Because it blocks COX-1 too, all the usual NSAID cautions apply — stomach, bleeding and kidneys.
The pain range is mild to moderate, not moderate alone.
A first-generation NSAID with an unusually long half-life — 15 to 20 hours — which is what shapes its dosing.
Meloxicam
Class
First-generation NSAID (inhibits COX-1 and COX-2)
Maximum daily dose
15 mg
Half-life
15–20 hours
FDA-approved indication
Arthritis
That half-life is the administration point. Most first-generation NSAIDs sit at 2–7 hours; meloxicam's 15–20 hours means levels persist across the day from a single dose, so it is dosed once daily rather than several times.
The principal indications for the non-aspirin NSAIDs are rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Certain of them are additionally used for fever, bursitis, tendinitis, mild to moderate pain, and dysmenorrhoea.
Unlike aspirin, the non-aspirin NSAIDs do NOT protect against MI. That protection is aspirin's alone — do not generalise it to the class.
Everything on the NSAID contraindications card applies here: meloxicam inhibits COX-1 as well as COX-2, so it carries the full gastric, bleeding and renal risk.
Principal indications are rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis, with others for fever, bursitis, tendinitis, mild to moderate pain and dysmenorrhoea; and unlike aspirin they do not protect against MI.
▣Course modulemodule wk4 §Drugs for Osteoarthritis
Places the NSAIDs among the osteoarthritis drugs.
Only part of this card is covered by the sources listed. The rest is not yet backed by anything we hold.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
COX enzymes
Topic 58 of 67✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Ch. 59. This card is placed as the mechanism the whole NSAID group hangs off, which is how the chapter uses it. The COX-1/COX-2 assignment is the reversal to guard — getting it backwards inverts every side effect on every later card. Week 4 has no deck, so nothing is cited from slides.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 59–63 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
There are two versions of this enzyme, and telling them apart explains every NSAID side effect you will ever be asked about.
COX-1 is everywhere, doing maintenance: protecting the stomach lining, keeping the kidneys working, helping platelets clump.
COX-2 appears where tissue is injured, and drives inflammation and pain. It is also in the brain, kidneys, blood vessels and colon.
So blocking COX-2 gives you the effect you wanted, and blocking COX-1 gives you the trouble.
The stomach part is worth knowing properly. COX-1 protects the stomach in three ways at once — less acid, more bicarbonate and protective mucus, and better blood flow under the lining. An NSAID knocks out all three together, which is why ulcers happen.
The COX blockers that fight inflammation are the NSAIDs — aspirin, ibuprofen, naproxen, celecoxib.
The one that does not fight inflammation is paracetamol/acetaminophen. It helps pain and fever only.
Older NSAIDs block both COX-1 and COX-2, so you cannot get the benefit without the ulcer and kidney risk.
Newer ones (coxibs) block only COX-2. In theory that should be safer — but the book says the opposite turned out to be true: they appear less safe overall, because they raise the risk of heart attack and stroke.
COX-1 is housekeeping. COX-2 is injury. Every NSAID side effect follows from which one you block.
Cyclooxygenase converts arachidonic acid into prostanoids — prostaglandins, prostacyclin, thromboxane A2. It is found in all tissues and regulates many processes at once.
COX-1
COX-2
Where
Practically all tissues
Mainly at sites of tissue injury; also brain, kidneys, blood vessels, colon
Mediates inflammation and sensitises receptors to pain; fever and pain perception in the brain
Blocking it gives you
The side effects
The therapeutic effect
Gastric protection is three mechanisms, not one. COX makes PGE2 and PGI2 in the stomach, which reduce gastric acid secretion, increase bicarbonate and cytoprotective mucus, and maintain submucosal blood flow. Block COX-1 and you lose all three at once — which is why NSAID ulcers happen.
The classification falls straight out of this:
COX inhibitors with anti-inflammatory properties = the NSAIDs — aspirin, ibuprofen, naproxen, celecoxib.
COX inhibitors without = one drug only, acetaminophen, which reduces pain and fever but cannot suppress inflammation.
First-generation NSAIDs inhibit COX-1 and COX-2 — so they cannot suppress pain and inflammation without risking gastric ulceration, bleeding and renal impairment.
Second-generation NSAIDs (coxibs) inhibit COX-2 only — in theory fewer adverse effects.
And then the book turns that on its head. In theory COX-2 selectivity should mean fewer adverse effects. In reality the coxibs appear even LESS safe than the first-generation agents, because they raise the risk of MI and stroke. Do not learn "newer means safer".
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch59 §Mechanism of action
COX converts arachidonic acid to prostanoids; gives the three gastric protective mechanisms, platelet and vascular effects, and splits COX-1 as housekeeping across all tissues from COX-2 as injury-site, brain, kidney, vessel and colon.
✓TextbookLehne ch59 §Classification of cyclooxygenase inhibitors
Splits COX inhibitors into those with and without anti-inflammatory action, names acetaminophen as the sole member of the second group, and separates first-generation (COX-1 and COX-2) from second-generation coxibs (COX-2 only), with the book's hedge on their supposed advantage.
▣Course modulemodule wk4 §Drugs for Osteoarthritis
Places the COX inhibitors among the week's musculoskeletal drugs.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Aspirin adverse effects
Topic 59 of 67✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Ch. 59. Two points chosen for prominence because they are counterintuitive: even a LOW dose is dangerous long term, and the ulcers are frequently silent, so no symptoms does not mean no ulcer. The three-from-COX-1 versus one-direct split is the mechanistic fact.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 59–63 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Taken for a few days for pain or fever, aspirin rarely does anything serious. The trouble comes from taking a lot of it for a long time, which is what treating inflammation requires.
Most people just get indigestion, heartburn or nausea — less so if taken with food or a big glass of water.
Slow, invisible bleeding from the gut is common. Barely anything on any one day, but over months it adds up to anaemia.
Even a low dose, taken long enough, can cause an ulcer that perforates or bleeds dangerously.
There are four reasons the ulcers happen: more acid and pepsin, less protective mucus and bicarbonate, less blood flow under the lining, and the tablet physically irritating the stomach.
Three of those four are the drug's chemistry, not the tablet touching anything — they come from blocking COX-1. Only the last one is direct contact, and it is worst with tablets that dissolve slowly, because the gritty bits lodge in the folds of the stomach and sit there.
The frightening part: these ulcers often cause no symptoms at all. Someone can perforate or start bleeding heavily with no warning. Feeling fine is not evidence of being fine.
Short-term at analgesic doses, serious effects are rare. The toxicity belongs to long-term, high-dose use for inflammation.
GI — the commonest and the most dangerous:
Gastric distress, heartburn, nausea — the most common. Reduced by taking it with food or a full glass of water.
Occult GI bleeding occurs often. Usually trivial per day, but chronic use accumulates into anaemia.
Taken long term, aspirin causes gastric ulcers that perforate and bleed dangerously — and a LOW dose is enough.
Ulcers have four causes — and the split matters:
Increased secretion of acid and pepsin
Decreased cytoprotective mucus and bicarbonate
Decreased submucosal blood flow
Aspirin physically irritating the stomach lining on contact
The first three follow from COX-1 inhibition — they are the mechanism, not the tablet touching the stomach. Only the fourth is direct injury, and it is worst with preparations that dissolve slowly: particulate aspirin gets trapped in the folds of the stomach wall, so the mucosa sits in a high concentration for a long time.
Aspirin-induced ulcers are often asymptomatic — so perforation and upper GI haemorrhage can happen with no warning signs at all. Absence of pain is not reassurance.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch59 §Aspirin — Adverse effects
Serious effects rare short-term but common long-term at high dose; the common GI symptoms; occult bleeding accumulating to anaemia; low-dose ulceration and bleeding; the four ulcer causes, three from COX-1 inhibition; and the frequent absence of warning signs.
▣Course modulemodule wk4 §Drugs for Osteoarthritis
Places the NSAIDs and their risks among the week's musculoskeletal drugs.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Colchicine indication
Topic 60 of 67✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Ch. 62. The whole point of this topic is that the indication has CHANGED, so the card leads with the demotion rather than burying it. The paediatric restriction is quoted with its qualifier because the book distinguishes gout prophylaxis from familial Mediterranean fever.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 59–63 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
The thing to know about colchicine is that its role has changed. It used to be the standard treatment for an acute gout attack — even though, as the textbook says plainly, the risks never really justified the benefits.
Now it is a fallback. It is kept for people who cannot tolerate the safer drugs, or who did not respond to them.
First choice for an attack: an NSAID.
Also fine: a steroid.
Colchicine: only if those are not options.
It sits in a category of its own — the antigout anti-inflammatory — separate from both the NSAIDs and the drugs that lower uric acid. There is also a combined tablet with probenecid, which puts the anti-inflammatory and the uric-acid-lowering effect together.
For preventing gout it is not recommended under 16. Note that limit is specifically about gout — it is used differently in familial Mediterranean fever.
The combination tablet is colchicine 0.5 mg with probenecid 500 mg — one a day for a week, then one twice a day.
No longer a drug of choice — reserved for those who cannot use the safer agents.
The book is blunt about the history. Colchicine held that first-line position for acute gout for years — and the text notes its risk-to-benefit ratio was never good even then. Now it is reserved for people who do not respond to, or cannot tolerate, the safer agents. If you learned it as first-line for a flare, that answer is out of date.
So what IS first-line for an acute attack:
NSAIDs — first-line for relieving the pain of an acute gouty attack.
Glucocorticoids — an acceptable option.
Colchicine — only when those cannot be used.
It is classified in the chapter as the antigout anti-inflammatory drug — a category of its own, separate from the NSAIDs above it and the urate-lowering drugs below. Marketed as Colcrys, Gloperba and Mitigare.
It also appears in a combination tablet with probenecid — colchicine 0.5 mg plus probenecid 500 mg — one daily for a week, then one twice daily, which pairs the anti-inflammatory action with a uricosuric.
Given for gout prophylaxis, colchicine is not recommended under 16 years. Note the qualifier: that restriction is about gout prophylaxis, not about its use in familial Mediterranean fever.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch62 §Drugs for gout
Colchicine was once a drug of choice for acute gout despite a poor risk/benefit ratio and is now generally reserved for patients unresponsive to or intolerant of safer agents, with NSAIDs first-line and glucocorticoids acceptable.
✓TextbookLehne ch62 §Table 62.1 and life-span table
Classifies colchicine as the antigout anti-inflammatory drug with its trade names, gives the colchicine-probenecid combination and its dosing, and states colchicine is not recommended under 16 years when given for gout prophylaxis as opposed to familial Mediterranean fever.
▣Course modulemodule wk4 §Drugs for Gout
Places colchicine among the week's gout drugs.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Celecoxib adverse effects
Topic 61 of 67✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Ch. 59. This is the single most reversal-prone fact in the unit: 'selective' reads as 'safer', and the book explicitly says the coxibs turned out LESS safe overall because of MI and stroke. The card states that in the book's own terms and gives the prostacyclin mechanism behind it.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 59–63 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Celecoxib is the newer kind of NSAID — it blocks only COX-2, leaving COX-1 alone. Up to 400 mg a day, and it lasts about 11 hours.
The idea was elegant. Older NSAIDs block both, so you cannot get pain relief without risking ulcers, bleeding and kidney damage. Block only COX-2 and you should get the benefit without the harm.
It did not work out that way. The textbook says plainly that the COX-2 drugs turned out to be less safe overall than the older ones, because they raise the risk of heart attack and stroke.
The reason is that COX in blood vessels makes prostacyclin, which keeps vessels relaxed. Block that and vessels stay tighter — and heart attacks and strokes follow.
So the honest summary is a swap, not an improvement: easier on the stomach, harder on the heart. "Newer" is not "safer" here.
The only second-generation NSAID here — and the safety promise did not hold.
Celecoxib (Celebrex) is a selective COX-2 inhibitor, a coxib. Maximum daily dose 400 mg, half-life about 11 hours.
The theory:
Because first-generation NSAIDs inhibit both COX isoforms, they cannot suppress pain and inflammation without risking gastric ulceration, bleeding and renal impairment. A COX-2-selective drug should suppress pain and inflammation while causing fewer adverse effects.
The evidence went the other way. The book's own verdict is that the coxibs turn out less safe overall than the older NSAIDs, because they raise the risk of MI and stroke. Sparing COX-1 spares the stomach; it does not make the drug safer.
The mechanism behind that: COX in blood vessels promotes prostacyclin, which causes vasodilation. Suppressing vasodilation promotes MI and stroke — which is listed among the effects of COX inhibition.
So the trade is real but narrow: less gastric risk than a first-generation NSAID, more cardiovascular risk. Neither the marketing framing nor "newer is safer" survives the evidence.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch59 §Classification of cyclooxygenase inhibitors
Second-generation NSAIDs inhibit COX-2 only and in theory should cause fewer adverse effects, but in reality appear even less safe than first-generation agents owing to an increased risk for MI and stroke.
✓TextbookLehne ch59 §Mechanism of action
COX in blood vessels promotes prostacyclin causing vasodilation, and lists promotion of MI and stroke secondary to suppressing vasodilation among the effects of COX inhibition.
Ch. 62. Two things flagged because they are the likely wrong answers: colchicine is no longer first-line for an acute attack, and the urate-lowering drugs do nothing for one. The three-per-year threshold is the decision point.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 59–63 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
The question that decides everything: how often does this person get attacks?
Fewer than three a year — just treat the attacks when they happen. NSAIDs are first choice for the pain; steroids are also fine.
Three or more a year, or chronic or tophaceous gout — now you also need to bring the uric acid level down.
Colchicine is no longer the go-to for an attack. It used to be, despite never having a good risk-to-benefit balance. Today it is kept for people who cannot take, or do not respond to, the safer options.
There are three ways to lower uric acid:
Make less of it — allopurinol, febuxostat.
Get rid of more of it — probenecid.
Turn it into something else the kidney can dump easily — pegloticase, rasburicase.
None of those five helps an attack that is happening now. They have no anti-inflammatory or painkilling effect at all. Starting allopurinol in the middle of a flare is answering a different question.
This all comes from the 2020 American College of Rheumatology guidelines.
Three attacks a year is the dividing line. Below it, treat symptoms. At or above it, lower the uric acid.
The 2020 American College of Rheumatology guidelines inform this. Two separate problems: treating an acute flare, and preventing recurrence.
Fewer than 3 flares/year
Chronic, tophaceous, or 3 or more flares/year
Aim
Treat the symptoms — that may be all that is needed
Drugs for hyperuricaemia
First-line
NSAIDs, for the pain of an acute attack
See the three mechanisms below
Also acceptable
Glucocorticoids
—
The book is blunt about the history. Colchicine held that first-line position for acute gout for years — and the text notes its risk-to-benefit ratio was never good even then. Now it is reserved for people who do not respond to, or cannot tolerate, the safer agents. If you learned it as first-line for a flare, that answer is out of date.
Three mechanisms for lowering uric acid — five drugs:
Convert uric acid to allantoin, readily excreted by the kidney — pegloticase, rasburicase
All five lack anti-inflammatory and analgesic action, so NONE of them is useful against an acute attack. Reaching for allopurinol in a flare treats the wrong problem.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch62 §Drugs for gout
Cites the 2020 ACR guidelines, separates acute flare from prevention, makes NSAIDs first-line with glucocorticoids acceptable, records colchicine's demotion to patients intolerant of safer agents, and sets three or more flares a year as the urate-lowering threshold.
✓TextbookLehne ch62 §Drugs for hyperuricemia
Names allopurinol, febuxostat, probenecid, pegloticase and rasburicase across three mechanisms, and states all five lack anti-inflammatory and analgesic action so are not useful in an acute attack.
▣Course modulemodule wk4 §Drugs for Gout
Places gout management among the week's content.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Uricosuric Agents
Topic 63 of 67✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Ch. 62 and its Table 62.1 plus the pharmacokinetic table. The card leads with the mechanism because 'uricosuric' names a mechanism rather than a drug, and repeats the no-acute-use point since it is the same trap as on the gout selection card.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 59–63 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
"Uricosuric" describes what the drug does, not what it is called: it makes the kidneys get rid of more uric acid. Probenecid is the one.
There are three ways to bring uric acid down, and this is the middle one — make less (allopurinol, febuxostat), excrete more (probenecid), or convert it into something easier to pass (pegloticase, rasburicase).
Start at 250 mg twice a day for a week, then settle on 500 mg twice a day.
It peaks in 2 to 4 hours and lasts 6 to 12.
Use a lower dose if the kidneys are impaired, since that is how it leaves the body.
It does nothing for an attack in progress — no painkilling, no anti-inflammatory effect. It is for people who keep getting gout, not for the person in pain in front of you today.
There is a combined tablet of colchicine and probenecid: one a day for a week, then twice a day.
A few more figures: 85–95% of a dose is absorbed, it is broken down by the liver and leaves in the urine, and the combination tablet is colchicine 0.5 mg with probenecid 500 mg. It has been given to children from age 2, for reasons other than gout.
The class that works by accelerating uric acid EXCRETION — one of three routes to a lower urate.
Probenecid is the uricosuric agent here. It sits alongside the drugs that inhibit uric acid formation (allopurinol, febuxostat) and those that convert uric acid to allantoin (pegloticase, rasburicase).
Probenecid
Mechanism
Accelerates uric acid excretion
Form
500-mg tablets
Starting dose
250 mg twice daily for 1 week
Maintenance
500 mg twice daily
Time to peak
2–4 hours
Bioavailability
85%–95%
Metabolism / excretion
Hepatic / urine
Half-life
6–12 hours
Like every urate-lowering drug, probenecid has no anti-inflammatory or analgesic action — it is useless in an acute attack. It is for the chronic problem: chronic gout, tophaceous gout, or three or more flares a year.
Dosage should be reduced in renal disease — which is the drug's own route of elimination. There is also a combination tablet of colchicine 0.5 mg with probenecid 500 mg: one daily for a week, then one twice daily.
It has been given to children from age 2, though for indications other than gout.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch62 §Drugs for hyperuricemia
Probenecid accelerates uric acid excretion, alongside allopurinol and febuxostat inhibiting formation and pegloticase and rasburicase converting urate to allantoin; and all five lack anti-inflammatory and analgesic action.
✓TextbookLehne ch62 §Table 62.1 and pharmacokinetics table
Gives probenecid's 500-mg tablets, 250 mg twice daily for a week then 500 mg twice daily, its 2-4 hour peak, 6-12 hour half-life, hepatic metabolism, the dose reduction in renal disease, and the colchicine-probenecid combination.
▣Course modulemodule wk4 §Drugs for Gout
Places the urate-lowering drugs among the week's gout content.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Calcitonin MOA
Topic 64 of 67✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Ch. 63 and Table 63.5. Both actions point the same way — down — which is the thing to hold, since a drug acting at bone and kidney could plausibly oppose itself. The not-a-drug-of-choice status is included because the topic title alone would not suggest it.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 59–63 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Calcitonin does two things, and both of them bring calcium down:
It stops the cells that dissolve bone from working, so less calcium is released out of the skeleton.
It stops the kidney reabsorbing calcium, so more of it leaves in the urine.
Because bone turnover slows, the alkaline phosphatase in blood falls and hydroxyproline in urine rises — those are the signs it is working.
It is not a first-choice drug. The specialist guidelines say there are better options now, and you are meant to weigh its risks before reaching for it. It is still one of the body's three calcium regulators, alongside parathyroid hormone and vitamin D — it is just been overtaken as a treatment.
Nasal spray: 200 IU — one spray — once a day, swapping nostrils each day.
Injection: 100 IU every other day for osteoporosis after the menopause; 100 IU daily for Paget disease. Same dose whether into muscle or under the skin.
One more indication: by injection it is also used for hypercalcaemia, starting at 4 IU/kg.
Two actions, and both lower calcium — one at bone, one at the kidney.
Inhibits the activity of osteoclasts, and so decreases bone resorption.
Inhibits tubular resorption of calcium, and so increases calcium excretion.
Slowing bone turnover shows up in two lab markers: alkaline phosphatase falls in the blood, and hydroxyproline rises in the urine — the signs the drug is working.
Calcitonin is NOT a drug of choice. The AACE and ACE clinical guidelines note there are more effective drugs on the market, and prescribers are told to weigh its risk before prescribing it. It is one of the three hormones that regulate calcium — with parathyroid hormone and vitamin D — but as a therapy it has been overtaken.
Preparations and doses:
Route
Indication
Dose
Intranasal
Postmenopausal osteoporosis
200 IU (1 spray) daily, alternating nares each day
Injection (IM or subQ)
Postmenopausal osteoporosis
100 IU every other day
Injection
Paget disease of bone
100 IU/day
Injection
Hypercalcaemia
initial 4 IU/kg
Dosages are the same for IM and subQ. Note the intranasal instruction to alternate nostrils daily — that is the administration detail most likely to be asked.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch63 §Calcitonin — Actions
Two principal actions: inhibiting osteoclast activity to decrease bone resorption, and inhibiting tubular resorption of calcium to increase excretion; with decreased blood alkaline phosphatase and increased urinary hydroxyproline from reduced bone turnover.
✓TextbookLehne ch63 §Calcitonin
AACE and ACE guidelines note more effective drugs exist so calcitonin is not a drug of choice, and prescribers should weigh its risk; and names PTH, vitamin D and calcitonin as the three calcium-regulating factors.
✓TextbookLehne ch63 §Table 63.5
Gives the intranasal 200 IU daily alternating nares, injection 100 IU every other day for postmenopausal osteoporosis, 100 IU daily for Paget disease and an initial 4 IU/kg for hypercalcaemia, with IM and subQ dosages the same.
▣Course modulemodule wk4 §Drugs for Osteoporosis
Places calcitonin among the week's osteoporosis drugs.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Calcium salts contraindication
Topic 65 of 67✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Ch. 63, including its prescribing-considerations box. The card pairs the contraindications with the fact that prolonged therapy CAUSES hypercalcaemia, because that circularity is the clinically useful part and is easy to miss when the two are read separately.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 59–63 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Do not give calcium to someone who already has too much calcium in the blood, who forms kidney stones, or whose phosphate is low. In each case you would be feeding the problem.
There is a neat circularity here: taking calcium for a long time causes high blood calcium — the very thing that rules it out. So check the level regularly.
Calcium is doing four jobs at once: holding bone together, controlling how nerves fire, letting muscle contract, and — easy to forget — helping blood clot.
Three things regulate it: parathyroid hormone, vitamin D and calcitonin.
If calcium is too low, nerves and muscles become over-excitable — cramps and spasms, sometimes fits. Correct a severe case with calcium into a vein (usually calcium gluconate), then keep it up with a tablet such as calcium citrate. Add vitamin D if that is low too.
What causes low calcium: most often a shortage of parathyroid hormone, vitamin D or dietary calcium. Also chronic kidney failure, and long-term use of magnesium-based laxatives or osteoporosis drugs such as bisphosphonates and denosumab.
And on calcium's jobs — in the cardiovascular system it is not only clotting: it drives the heart muscle contracting and blood vessels contracting too.
Three contraindications, and each one is a state where adding calcium makes the existing problem worse.
Prolonged therapy can cause hypercalcaemia, which is minimised by frequent monitoring of serum calcium. So the first contraindication is also the main adverse effect — the drug can create the state it must not be given in.
Why calcium matters at all — four systems:
Skeletal — structural integrity of bone.
Nervous — regulates axonal excitability and transmitter release.
Muscular — excitation-contraction coupling and contraction.
Cardiovascular — myocardial contraction, vascular contraction, and blood coagulation.
Regulated by three factors: parathyroid hormone, vitamin D and calcitonin. Failure of those mechanisms produces hypercalcaemia or hypocalcaemia.
Treating hypocalcaemia:
Severe hypocalcaemia is corrected by infusing IV calcium — usually calcium gluconate. Once levels are restored, an oral calcium salt such as calcium citrate maintains them. Vitamin D should be included if there is a coexisting deficiency. Hypocalcaemia raises neuromuscular excitability, so tetany, convulsions and pharyngeal spasm can occur.
Its commonest causes are a deficiency of PTH, vitamin D or dietary calcium; also chronic renal failure and long-term use of magnesium-based laxatives or osteoporosis drugs such as bisphosphonates and denosumab.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch63 §Summary of key prescribing considerations: calcium salts
Contraindicated in hypercalcaemia, renal calculi and hypophosphataemia; prolonged therapy can cause hypercalcaemia, minimised by frequent serum calcium monitoring.
✓TextbookLehne ch63 §Calcium physiology
Gives calcium's roles across the skeletal, nervous, muscular and cardiovascular systems including coagulation, and names PTH, vitamin D and calcitonin as its three regulators.
✓TextbookLehne ch63 §Hypocalcemia
Raised neuromuscular excitability with tetany, convulsions and pharyngeal spasm; commonest causes; IV calcium gluconate for severe cases then oral calcium citrate, with vitamin D added if coexisting deficiency.
▣Course modulemodule wk4 §Drugs for Osteoporosis
Places calcium supplementation among the week's bone content.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Vitamin D deficiency
Topic 66 of 67✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Ch. 63. The card separates the 20 ng/mL sufficiency threshold from the 30-60 practice target because conflating them is the obvious error, and the book states both. The three age-banded doses are the Endocrine Society's, cited as such.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 59–63 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
You measure vitamin D by a blood test called 25-hydroxyvitamin D, or 25(OH)D. The liver converts vitamin D into this form, so it is a good reflection of how much someone actually has.
Under 20 ng/mL — deficient.
Over 20 — enough for healthy bones.
But in practice you aim for 30 to 60.
Those last two are not the same question. Twenty-five is not deficient, and is still below where you would want it.
How much to give, according to the Endocrine Society:
Under 1 year — 2000 IU a day.
1 to 18 years — 4000 IU a day.
19 and over — up to 10,000 IU a day.
Considerably more is needed for people with obesity, and for anyone on steroids or other drugs that block calcium absorption or flush calcium out.
There are two forms — D2 from plants and D3 made in your skin from sunlight — and they do essentially the same thing in the body.
Their proper names are ergocalciferol (D2) and cholecalciferol (D3).
Measured as serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Deficiency is below 20 ng/mL.
Vitamin D is best measured by 25(OH)D — the liver converts vitamin D to 25(OH)D, also called calcidol, so its serum level represents deficiency well.
25(OH)D level
Meaning
Below 20 ng/mL
Deficiency
Above 20 ng/mL
Sufficient to maintain bone health
30–60 ng/mL
The target level in actual practice
Note the gap. The threshold for sufficiency is 20, but practice aims at 30–60 — so a level of 25 is not deficient and is still below target. Those two numbers answer different questions.
Endocrine Society doses for treating deficiency:
Children younger than 1 year: 2000 IU/day
Children 1 to 18 years: 4000 IU/day
Adults 19 and older: up to 10,000 IU/day
People with obesity need considerably more, and so does anyone on glucocorticoids or other drugs that block calcium absorption or drive calcium out.
Two forms: ergocalciferol (D2) comes from plants and is what gets prescribed and added to fortified food; cholecalciferol (D3) is what human skin makes in sunlight. Both appear in supplements, and their biological effects are near enough identical.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch63 §Vitamin D deficiency
25(OH)D is the measure, deficiency is below 20 ng/mL, above 20 is sufficient for bone health, the practical target is 30-60, and gives the Endocrine Society doses by age band plus the need for much higher doses in obesity and with glucocorticoids.
✓TextbookLehne ch63 §Vitamin D
Defines ergocalciferol (D2) from plants and cholecalciferol (D3) made in skin on sun exposure, and states both produce nearly identical biologic effects.
▣Course modulemodule wk4 §Drugs for Osteoporosis
Places vitamin D among the week's bone content.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Bisphosphonate administration
Topic 67 of 67✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Ch. 63. The card is built backwards from the four causes of incomplete oesophageal passage, because that is what the administration instructions actually are and it makes them impossible to mix up. The 1-in-10,000 figure is included so the risk is not overstated.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 59–63 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Everything you are told about how to take these tablets comes down to one thing: do not let the tablet get stuck on the way down.
If it lodges in the gullet it burns the lining, and that can ulcerate. It is rare — about 1 in 10,000 people — but it is the most serious thing these drugs do.
It happens for four reasons, and each one tells you the instruction:
Not enough water → take it with plenty.
Taking it lying down → sit or stand up.
Lying down afterwards → stay upright.
An existing problem with the gullet → check before prescribing.
How it works: it shuts down the cells that dissolve bone, both by reducing how many there are and by poisoning the ones that swallow it while chewing through treated bone.
About half the dose goes straight into bone and stays there for years, sometimes decades. That is why the rare problems — jaw bone dying, unusual thigh fractures — become likelier the longer someone takes it. It is also why the protection carries on for years after stopping.
The prototype is alendronate (Fosamax) — the most widely used oral bisphosphonate. Four are approved for osteoporosis: alendronate, ibandronate, risedronate and zoledronic acid.
The everyday side effect is indigestion. The rare ones are musculoskeletal pain, inflammation in the eye, unusual thigh fractures and jaw bone dying.
There is a second half to the mechanism: as well as poisoning the osteoclasts that swallow it, alendronate reduces how many get recruited, and acts on osteoblasts, which then make something that blocks new osteoclasts forming.
Every administration rule exists to stop the tablet sitting in the oesophagus.
Alendronate (Fosamax) is the most widely used oral bisphosphonate and the prototype. Roughly 50% is taken up rapidly by bone, and once incorporated it remains there for years and sometimes decades.
Oesophagitis, sometimes with ulceration, is the most serious adverse effect — though rare, at 1 in every 10,000 patients. The cause is prolonged contact with the oesophageal mucosa when the tablet fails to pass right through.
The four reasons it fails to pass — each one is an administration instruction in reverse:
Taking it with insufficient water
Taking it while lying down
Lying down after taking it
A pre-existing oesophageal disorder impeding passage
Mechanism, which explains why it lasts:
Suppresses bone resorption by decreasing both the number and the activity of osteoclasts.
Osteoclasts resorbing alendronate-containing bone ingest the drug, which then inhibits them.
It also reduces osteoclast recruitment, and acts on osteoblasts, which produce an inhibitor of osteoclast formation.
Other adverse effects: indigestion commonly. Rarely — and more likely the longer someone takes it — musculoskeletal pain, ocular inflammation, atypical femur fractures, and osteonecrosis of the jaw. Because the drug stays in bone so long, it keeps preventing fractures for years after being stopped.
The four approved for osteoporosis: alendronate, ibandronate, risedronate, zoledronic acid.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch63 §Alendronate — Mechanism of action
About 50% is taken up rapidly by bone and remains for years or decades; suppresses resorption by decreasing both osteoclast number and activity, via ingestion by resorbing osteoclasts, reduced recruitment, and an osteoblast-produced inhibitor of osteoclast formation.
Oesophagitis is the most serious concern at 1 in 10,000, from prolonged mucosal contact, with the four reasons for incomplete passage; rarely musculoskeletal pain, ocular inflammation, atypical femur fractures and osteonecrosis of the jaw.
✓TextbookLehne ch63 §Bisphosphonates
Names alendronate, ibandronate, risedronate and zoledronic acid as the four approved for osteoporosis and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.
▣Course modulemodule wk4 §Drugs for Osteoporosis
Places the bisphosphonates among the week's osteoporosis drugs.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.