All ten assigned chapters are in the folder, plus chapter 40 which the course does not assign. Eighteen of the nineteen cards are textbook-backed; Beta Blockers is not, because Lehne covers that class in chapter 16, which this course does not assign — that card is built from her deck and says so on its face.
The percentage is how much has been LOOKED UP, not how much is correct. To check a single card, open its badge — it names the chapter or slide behind that card.
Ch. 41. The distinction the aspects ask for — indication and medication selection — is exactly the chapter's own structure. The trap is assuming a drug that lowers BP equally is an equal choice; the book says outcomes and BP are different questions.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 36–39 and 41–46 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Aim for a blood pressure under 130 over 80 in adults. The real goal is not the number — it is fewer heart attacks, strokes and failing kidneys. Everyone gets lifestyle advice as well as any tablets.
The whole decision hangs on one thing: does this person have a compelling indication? That means another condition — heart failure or diabetes, for instance — where one particular family of blood-pressure drug has actually been proven to make people do better.
No compelling indication → start a thiazide diuretic for most people. They are proven to reduce deaths, well tolerated, and cheap.
With one → start the class proven to help that condition, and add others later if the pressure is still high.
Here is the catch worth remembering: ACE inhibitors, ARBs and calcium channel blockers bring the number down just as well as a thiazide. They may not keep people alive as well. Lowering the reading and improving the outcome are two different achievements.
Two families are deliberately not used to start with — the centrally acting sympatholytics and the direct-acting vasodilators. They cause too many side effects to be a sensible first move.
The choice turns on one question: is there a compelling indication?
Adult target: SBP under 130 mm Hg, DBP under 80 mm Hg. What that target is FOR is reducing cardiovascular and renal morbidity and mortality — without wrecking quality of life with the drugs used. Lifestyle change is indicated for every patient.
Indication:
A compelling indication is a comorbid condition for which a specific antihypertensive class has been shown to improve outcomes — heart failure and diabetes are the examples. That is a higher bar than "seems sensible".
Medication selection:
First choice
Why
No compelling indication
Thiazide diuretic, for most patients
Long-term trials show they reduce morbidity and mortality; well tolerated and inexpensive
With a compelling indication
The class shown to improve outcomes for that condition
National guidelines put it first; add other agents afterwards if needed
ACEIs, ARBs and CCBs equal thiazides at lowering blood pressure — but may not equal them at reducing morbidity and mortality. So they are reserved for special indications and for patients who did not respond to a thiazide. Equally effective on the number is not the same as equally effective on the outcome.
Centrally acting sympatholytics and direct-acting vasodilators carry a high incidence of adverse effects, so they are poorly suited to initial therapy.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch41 §Treatment goals
Gives the adult target of below 130/80 and frames the aim as reducing cardiovascular and renal morbidity and mortality, with lifestyle change for all.
✓TextbookLehne ch41 §Initial drug selection
Defines a compelling indication, makes a thiazide first-line without one, and explains why ACEIs, ARBs and CCBs are reserved despite matching thiazides on blood pressure.
◆Slideswk2 s9
Her own summary of first-line therapy for hypertension.
▣Course modulemodule wk2 §Drugs for Hypertension
Frames tailoring treatment to the individual against current clinical practice guidelines.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Beta Blockers
Topic 27 of 67◆slides
◆slides
Your instructor's own slide deck carries this, but nobody has checked it against the textbook yet. Not a lesser source — she writes the exam — just a different promise.
The body of this card is HER DECK, because Lehne puts β blockers in Ch. 16 and this course assigns 36-46. The assigned chapters were searched and contribute only the AV-block caution, the historical heart-failure contraindication and the breastfeeding note, which are marked on the card. status is SLIDES rather than TEXTBOOK for exactly that reason — the badge should not claim the book backs the mechanism, because it does not.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 36–39 and 41–46 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Beta blockers switch off the receptors adrenaline works through in the heart. The heart then beats more slowly and less hard, so it pushes out less blood — which is how the pressure comes down.
Note where this comes from: your textbook explains beta blockers in a chapter your course does not assign, so this card is built from your instructor's slides.
What they are for: high blood pressure, heart failure, abnormal rhythms, after a heart attack, and ordinary exertional angina — but not the variant kind. Non-selective ones are also used for migraine prevention and glaucoma.
The split that gets tested:
Non-selective (propranolol, nadolol, timolol) hit β₁ in the heart and β₂ in the lungs. The β₂ part tightens airways, so avoid them in asthma and COPD.
Cardioselective (metoprolol, atenolol, bisoprolol) mostly hit β₁ only, so they are safer if the lungs are mildly affected.
Side effects: tiredness, a slow pulse, and wheeze. They also worsen heart block, so avoid them in anyone who already has it.
One reversal worth knowing: until the mid-1990s heart failure was considered an absolute reason never to give a beta blocker. That is no longer true. And metoprolol appears safe for a breastfeeding baby.
Block β-adrenergic receptors, so the heart beats slower and less forcefully — and cardiac output falls.
This card is built from her deck, not the book. Lehne covers β blockers in Chapter 16, which this course does not assign and the folder does not hold. Chapters 36–46 use them constantly but never explain them. Where the assigned chapters do say something, it is marked below.
Decreased contractility — less forceful contractions.
Lowered stroke volume — less blood ejected per beat.
Selectivity is the exam distinction:
Non-selective
Cardioselective (β₁-selective)
Receptors
β₁ (heart) and β₂ (lungs, vessels)
Primarily β₁
Examples
propranolol, nadolol, timolol
metoprolol, atenolol, bisoprolol
Asthma / COPD
Avoid — β₂ blockade causes bronchoconstriction
Safer in mild lung disease
Adverse effects:
Fatigue
Bradycardia
Bronchospasm
From the assigned chapters: β blockers intensify AV block, so they should not be taken by people with that. Until the mid-1990s heart failure was considered an absolute contraindication — it no longer is. Metoprolol appears safe for a breastfeeding infant.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch41 §Minimizing adverse effects
States that β blockers intensify AV block and should be avoided in that disorder.
✓TextbookLehne ch42 §Promotion of baroreceptor dysfunction
Records that heart failure was considered an absolute contraindication until the mid-1990s.
◆Slideswk2 s4
Her mechanism, indications, examples and the fatigue/bradycardia/bronchospasm triad, plus the three components of reduced cardiac output.
◆Slideswk2 s5
Splits non-selective from cardioselective with examples, and gives the asthma/COPD caution for β2 blockade.
◆Slideswk2 s17
Places β blockers in chronic stable angina and excludes variant angina.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
ACE inhibitors
Topic 28 of 67✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Ch. 38. Both aspects are covered from the chapter's own §Mechanism of action. Attributing cough to bradykinin rather than to angiotensin II is the distinction that makes the ARB comparison make sense, and it is the one most likely to be muddled.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 36–39 and 41–46 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
ACE inhibitors do two things at once, and every effect — helpful or not — comes from one of them: they cut angiotensin II, and they raise bradykinin.
Less angiotensin II means blood vessels relax (mostly the small arteries), the kidneys hold on to less fluid, and — most importantly — the heart and blood vessels stop being remodelled into a worse shape. That last one is why these drugs help people live longer, not just show a better reading.
Cough comes from the bradykinin side.
High potassium and harm to a fetus come from the ACE side.
This explains ARBs. They block angiotensin II at the receptor instead, and they leave bradykinin alone — so they cause much less cough, which is the usual reason people give up on an ACE inhibitor. Lisinopril is the typical ACE inhibitor; losartan the typical ARB.
Two mechanisms, and every good and bad effect traces to one of them.
MOA — both arms matter:
Reduce angiotensin II, by inhibiting ACE.
Increase bradykinin, by inhibiting kinase II.
From LESS angiotensin II:
Dilate blood vessels — arterioles chiefly, veins to a lesser extent.
Reduce blood volume, through effects on the kidney.
Prevent or reverse pathologic remodelling of heart and vessels driven by angiotensin II and aldosterone. This is the part that changes outcomes rather than numbers.
Adverse effects:
Effect
Which mechanism
Cough
Raised bradykinin in the lung
Hyperkalaemia
ACE inhibition
Fetal injury
ACE inhibition
The bradykinin arm is why ARBs differ. ARBs block angiotensin II at its receptor and do not inhibit kinase II, so bradykinin does not rise — giving them a lower risk of cough, which is the commonest reason people stop an ACE inhibitor. Same target system, one mechanism fewer.
✓TextbookLehne ch38 §Mechanism of action and overview of pharmacologic effects
Gives the two mechanisms and traces vasodilation, reduced blood volume, prevention of remodelling, hyperkalaemia and fetal injury to reduced angiotensin II, with vasodilation also from raised bradykinin.
✓TextbookLehne ch38 §Mechanism of action and overview of pharmacologic effects (ARBs)
ARBs do not inhibit kinase II so bradykinin does not rise, giving a lower risk of cough — the commonest reason for stopping an ACE inhibitor.
◆Slideswk2 s9
Contrasts ACE inhibitors and ARBs with beta blockers and diuretics by the system each targets.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
RAAS
Topic 29 of 67✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Ch. 38, which is where the whole system is set out. The two aspects the school lists — 'system' and 'inhibitors' — are the chapter's own two halves, so the card is organised that way. No slide covers RAAS as a system, so none is cited.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 36–39 and 41–46 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
The renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system is the body's own blood-pressure control loop. It sets pressure, blood volume, and the balance of salt and water — and it is also the thing that goes wrong in high blood pressure, heart failure and after a heart attack.
It works through two chemicals: angiotensin II and aldosterone.
Angiotensin II does two obvious things, and both push pressure up: it squeezes blood vessels, and it tells the adrenal glands to release aldosterone, which holds on to salt and water.
It does a third thing that is not about pressure at all: over time it physically reshapes the heart and blood vessels for the worse. That is why blocking this system saves lives rather than just improving a reading.
ACE inhibitors stop angiotensin II being made — lisinopril.
ARBs let it be made but block it at the receptor — losartan.
Direct renin inhibitors shut the pathway down at the very first step.
One more mechanism: when an ARB blocks angiotensin II receptors in the adrenal glands, less aldosterone is released, so the kidneys pass more sodium and water — and that effect is increased further because the drug widens the kidney's own blood vessels.
Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone: the system that sets blood pressure, blood volume and fluid balance — and remodels the heart when it runs unchecked.
System:
The RAAS regulates blood pressure, blood volume, and fluid and electrolyte balance, and it also mediates pathophysiologic changes in hypertension, heart failure and MI. It acts through two effectors: angiotensin II and aldosterone.
What angiotensin II does — two prominent actions, both raising BP:
Vasoconstriction.
Stimulation of aldosterone release.
Angiotensin II and aldosterone do something else to the heart and vessels: over time they change the shape and behaviour of the tissue itself. That third action has nothing to do with blood pressure, and it is why blocking this system does more than lower a number.
Inhibitors — three points of attack on one pathway:
Class
Where it acts
Prototype
ACE inhibitor
Blocks the enzyme making angiotensin II (and raises bradykinin)
lisinopril
ARB
Blocks angiotensin II at its receptor
losartan
Direct renin inhibitor
Blocks the pathway at its first step
—
ARBs blocking angiotensin II receptors in the adrenals decreases aldosterone release, increasing renal excretion of sodium and water — increased further by dilating renal blood vessels.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch38 §Physiology of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system
Names what the system regulates, the conditions whose pathophysiology it mediates, and angiotensin II and aldosterone as its effectors.
✓TextbookLehne ch38 §Actions of angiotensin II
Gives vasoconstriction and aldosterone release as the two prominent actions, both raising blood pressure, plus the structural changes in heart and vessels.
✓TextbookLehne ch38 §Drugs acting on the RAAS
Names the three prototype classes — ACE inhibitor, ARB and direct renin inhibitor — and where each acts.
▣Course modulemodule wk2 §Key Points
Places the RAAS among the systems prescribers must understand for cardiovascular conditions.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Nifedipine side effects
Topic 30 of 67◐textbook
◐textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Only part of this concept is covered by that source.
PARTIAL, and deliberately. Ch. 39's §Nifedipine section in the paste covers sites of action and the toxic-dose caveat, then moves to verapamil as the prototype — the detailed adverse-effect list for nifedipine specifically is not in the material we hold. The card gives what the chapter states and does not manufacture a side-effect list to fill the topic title.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 36–39 and 41–46 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Nifedipine is a calcium channel blocker of the dihydropyridine kind. At normal doses it works on the small arteries and leaves the heart alone.
Dihydropyridines — nifedipine, amlodipine — act on arteries.
Non-dihydropyridines — verapamil, diltiazem — act on arteries and the heart.
The important catch: "it does not affect the heart" is only true at a normal dose. In overdose it can suppress the heart dangerously, just like verapamil and diltiazem do.
Note the assigned chapter covers where nifedipine acts, then moves on to verapamil as its main example — so a full list of nifedipine's own side effects is not in the material this guide has.
A dihydropyridine CCB: at therapeutic doses it acts on arterioles only, not the heart.
Dihydropyridines
Non-dihydropyridines
Examples
nifedipine, amlodipine
verapamil, diltiazem
Site at therapeutic dose
Arterioles
Arterioles and the heart
The exception that matters: at a therapeutic dose a dihydropyridine leaves the heart alone — but a toxic dose can suppress it dangerously, exactly as verapamil and diltiazem do. "Vascular-selective" is a statement about the dose, not about the drug.
The selectivity difference between calcium channel blockers comes from structural differences in the drugs themselves and in the calcium channels they meet.
Because a dihydropyridine dilates arterioles without slowing the heart, the predictable effects follow from vasodilation and the reflex response to it.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch39 §Nifedipine
Places dihydropyridines on arterioles and non-dihydropyridines on arterioles and heart at therapeutic doses, and warns that toxic doses of a dihydropyridine can suppress the heart dangerously.
◆Slideswk2 s12
Her own coverage of calcium channel blockers among the antihypertensives.
Only part of this card is covered by the sources listed. The rest is not yet backed by anything we hold.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Heart failure treatment selection
Topic 31 of 67✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Ch. 42, stage by stage. The stage-D reversal is the highest-value line on this card: the same two classes that are recommended in stage B are the ones that can do harm in stage D, and a reader who learns 'ACEI plus beta blocker for heart failure' as a flat rule gets stage D wrong.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 36–39 and 41–46 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Four kinds of drug do the routine work: water tablets, drugs that block the renin system, SGLT-2 inhibitors, and beta blockers. Digoxin and a few others get added when needed.
Which ones you reach for depends on the stage:
Stage A — at risk but nothing wrong yet. Control the blood pressure, cholesterol and diabetes; stop smoking and heavy drinking.
Stage B — the heart has changed shape but there are no symptoms. Add an ACE inhibitor and a beta blocker if the pumping is weak or there has been a heart attack.
Stage C — symptoms have appeared. Now you are aiming at four things: clear the fluid, help them function, slow the damage, and help them live longer.
Stage D — symptoms even at rest, on the maximum of everything. Mostly about managing fluid: daily weights, loop diuretics, sometimes into a vein. A transplant is the real answer.
The catch that trips people up: the very drugs you add in stage B become risky in stage D. Beta blockers can make severe heart failure worse, and ACE inhibitors can drop the blood pressure dangerously or damage the kidneys — so if they are used at all, it is at low dose with close watching.
A few details worth carrying:
The ACC/AHA stages sit alongside the older NYHA classification rather than replacing it.
In stage A, an ACE inhibitor or ARB is useful for diabetes, atherosclerosis or high blood pressure, and an SGLT-2 inhibitor for type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk.
In stage B, use an ARB if the person cannot tolerate an ACE inhibitor.
In stage D, the loop diuretic is sometimes combined with a thiazide, and intake and output are tracked strictly as well as daily weights.
Beyond the four main classes, digoxin, dopamine and hydralazine may be added.
And an honest negative: there is no evidence that regular exercise prevents heart failure developing, or stops stage B becoming symptomatic — though exercise is good for other reasons. Routine supplements are not recommended for prevention either.
Four drug classes for routine therapy — and which you use depends on the ACC/AHA stage.
The four:
Diuretics
Agents that inhibit the RAAS
SGLT-2 inhibitors
β blockers
Others — digoxin, dopamine, hydralazine — may be used as well. The ACC/AHA staging complements the NYHA functional classification rather than replacing it.
Stage
What it is
Treatment
A
Risk factors, no symptoms and no structural abnormality
Reduce risk: control hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes. ACEI or ARB for diabetes, atherosclerosis or hypertension. SGLT-2 inhibitor in type 2 diabetes at high CV risk. Stop smoking and alcohol abuse.
B
Structural disease, still no symptoms
Everything in A, plus ACEI + β blocker for reduced ejection fraction, prior MI, or both. ARB if ACEI not tolerated.
C
Structural disease with symptoms
A and B, plus more. Four goals: relieve congestion, improve function and quality of life, slow remodelling, prolong life.
D
Advanced disease, symptoms at rest on maximal stage-C therapy
Control fluid: daily weights, strict intake/output, loop diuretic ± thiazide, IV diuretic if severe. Transplant is the best long-term answer.
Stage D reverses the usual advice. β blockers pose a significant risk of making heart failure worse there, and ACEIs may cause profound hypotension or renal failure — so both are used at low dose with careful monitoring, if at all. The drugs that are first-line in stage B become hazardous in stage D.
There is no evidence that regular exercise prevents heart failure developing, or prevents stage B progressing to symptoms — though exercise has other benefits. Routine dietary supplements are not recommended for prevention.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch42 §Overview of drugs used to treat heart failure
Names the four routine classes and the additional agents.
✓TextbookLehne ch42 §Stage A / §Stage B
Gives the risk-reduction measures, the ACEI-or-ARB indications, the SGLT-2 indication in type 2 diabetes at high risk, and the ACEI-plus-beta-blocker recommendation in stage B — plus the absence of evidence for exercise or supplements.
✓TextbookLehne ch42 §Stage C / §Stage D
Gives stage C's four treatment goals, and stage D's fluid management, transplant option, and the risk that beta blockers worsen HF while ACEIs cause hypotension or renal failure.
◆Slideswk2 s13
Her own summary of heart-failure drug therapy.
▣Course modulemodule wk2 §Key Points
Frames tailoring heart-failure treatment to the individual against current guidelines.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Digoxin
Topic 32 of 67✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Ch. 42, including the prescribing-considerations box for the monitoring aspect. Both aspects are covered. The 0.5-0.8 ng/mL window and the hypokalaemia caution are the two numbers not to garble; note the potassium link is a caution about digoxin toxicity, not a target range.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 36–39 and 41–46 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Digoxin makes the heart contract more forcefully, so it pumps more blood per beat. It also changes the heart's electrical behaviour and its hormone signalling.
It genuinely helps how people feel — fewer symptoms, more exercise tolerance, fewer hospital stays. But it does not help them live longer, and in women it may shorten life. That is why it has dropped to a second-choice drug.
It is a dangerous drug for one specific reason: the dose that causes serious rhythm problems is close to the dose that works.
Before starting: ECG, electrolytes, kidney function.
Aim for a blood level of 0.5 to 0.8 ng/mL.
Keep an eye on the pulse in case it goes too slow.
Teach them the warning signs — a change in heart rate or rhythm, disturbed vision, or nausea and vomiting — and to ring in if they appear.
Never give it to someone in ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia. Be careful in kidney impairment or low potassium, which makes toxicity more likely — so potassium supplements and potassium-sparing water tablets must be taken exactly as prescribed.
Two things easy to lose: digoxin is licensed for heart failure AND for controlling abnormal rhythms, not just heart failure. And you check the blood level at particular moments — when someone's symptoms have not budged after starting it, or when you suspect toxicity — rather than routinely.
A cardiac glycoside that makes the heart squeeze harder — and a second-line drug, because it does not prolong life.
MOA:
Positive inotropic action — increases myocardial contractile force, and so increases cardiac output.
Alters the electrical activity of the heart.
Favourably affects neurohormonal systems.
In heart failure it reduces symptoms, increases exercise tolerance and decreases hospitalisations — but does not prolong life, and in women it may actually shorten it. Benefit limited to symptom relief plus substantial toxicity risk is why it is second-line. Indicated for HF and for control of dysrhythmias.
Digitalis is a dangerous drug: it causes severe dysrhythmias at doses close to therapeutic. That narrow margin is the whole reason for the monitoring below.
Optimal plasma level 0.5–0.8 ng/mL. Measure it when symptoms are unchanged after starting, or when toxicity is suspected.
Keep watching heart rate for excessive bradycardia.
Teach the patient the early signs: altered heart rate or rhythm, visual disturbances, GI upset — and to report them.
Contraindicated in ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia. Caution in renal insufficiency or hypokalaemia — and if a potassium supplement or potassium-sparing diuretic is in the regimen, it must be taken exactly as ordered.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch42 §Digoxin, a cardiac glycoside
Gives the positive inotropic mechanism plus electrical and neurohormonal effects, the symptom-only benefit, the failure to prolong life and possible shortening in women, second-line status, and the narrow margin before severe dysrhythmias.
✓TextbookLehne ch42 §Summary of key prescribing considerations: Digoxin
Gives the baseline tests, the 0.5-0.8 ng/mL optimal level, when to measure, bradycardia monitoring, the ventricular fibrillation and tachycardia contraindications, and caution in renal insufficiency and hypokalaemia.
✓TextbookLehne ch42 §Digoxin toxicity
Lists the toxicity symptoms patients must be taught to report and the instruction on potassium supplements and potassium-sparing diuretics.
◆Slideswk2 s14
Her own coverage of digoxin among the heart-failure drugs.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Amiodarone adverse effects
Topic 33 of 67✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Ch. 43 and its two black box boxes. Three things a card here must not blur: the thyroid effect goes in BOTH directions, corneal microdeposits are near-universal and benign while optic neuritis is rare and serious, and the liver stop rule is three times normal.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 36–39 and 41–46 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Amiodarone works extremely well on both upper- and lower-chamber rhythm problems. It is also toxic enough to carry two black box warnings, and its side effects can carry on for months after someone stops taking it.
Lungs — the big one. It can scar and inflame the lungs. This happens to somewhere between 2 and 17 in 100 people taking it, and about 1 in 10 of those die. The catch is that breathlessness, cough and chest pain look exactly like heart failure or pneumonia, so it gets blamed on the wrong thing. Get a chest X-ray and lung function test before starting, keep checking, and stop the drug if the lungs are damaged.
Liver. Check liver blood tests at the start and regularly. If the enzymes go above three times normal, stop the drug.
Thyroid — in either direction. It can make the thyroid underactive or overactive, so check it regularly.
Eyes. Nearly everyone gets tiny deposits on the cornea, and those are harmless. Very rarely the optic nerve is affected, which can end in blindness.
Skin. It makes people burn easily in sunlight — sunblock and covered arms.
Lung damage is most likely in people on a high dose for a long time.
More detail worth holding:
It is a class III antidysrhythmic.
It is only approved for life-threatening ventricular rhythms that safer drugs have failed to control — even though it is widely used beyond that.
Liver injury, when it shows at all, looks like: loss of appetite, nausea, vomiting, feeling generally unwell, tiredness, itching, jaundice and dark urine.
An underactive thyroid is treated with thyroid hormone; an overactive one with an antithyroid drug such as methimazole, or surgery.
The link to blindness is not proven — the book says a causal relationship has not been established.
Highly effective against atrial AND ventricular dysrhythmias — and toxic enough to carry two black box warnings.
A class III antidysrhythmic. Approved only for life-threatening ventricular dysrhythmias refractory to safer agents, because the toxicities are common and may persist for months after treatment stops. Despite that it is one of the most frequently prescribed antidysrhythmics, used for atrial and ventricular rhythms alike.
BLACK BOX — pulmonary toxicity, the greatest concern. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis, interstitial/alveolar pneumonitis, pulmonary fibrosis. Develops in 2% to 17% of patients, with a 10% risk of mortality. The symptoms — dyspnoea, cough, chest pain — resemble heart failure and pneumonia, which is exactly why it gets missed. Baseline chest radiograph and pulmonary function test; monitor throughout; withdraw if lung injury develops.
BLACK BOX — liver toxicity. Liver function at baseline and periodically. Discontinue if enzymes exceed three times normal. Signs, seen only rarely: anorexia, nausea, vomiting, malaise, fatigue, itching, jaundice, dark urine.
The rest, and they are not minor:
Thyroid — either way. It causes hypo- OR hyperthyroidism. Assess thyroid function at baseline and periodically. Hypo is treated with thyroid hormone; hyper with an antithyroid drug such as methimazole, or thyroidectomy.
Eyes. Virtually all patients develop corneal microdeposits — these barely affect vision and rarely require stopping. Separately and rarely, optic neuropathy or neuritis, sometimes progressing to blindness (causation not established).
Skin. Photosensitivity is frequent — avoid sunlamps, use sunblock and cover up.
Class III, effective against atrial and ventricular dysrhythmias, approved only for refractory life-threatening ventricular dysrhythmias, with toxicities persisting months after stopping.
Names the lung injuries, the 2-17% incidence with 10% mortality, the resemblance to heart failure and pneumonia, the baseline and ongoing monitoring, and withdrawal on injury.
✓TextbookLehne ch43 §Amiodarone: Liver toxicity
Gives the monitoring, the three-times-normal discontinuation threshold, the rare signs, the bidirectional thyroid effect, corneal microdeposits versus optic neuropathy, and photosensitivity.
◆Slideswk2 s16
Her own coverage of antidysrhythmic drugs.
▣Course modulemodule wk2 §Drugs for Arrhythmias
Places amiodarone among the arrhythmia drugs a prescriber must know.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Atrial Fibrillation treatment
Topic 34 of 67✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Ch. 43. The two-goal framing is the chapter's own and is what makes the rest make sense. The counterintuitive fact worth flagging on the card is that restoring sinus rhythm is when the trapped clot can dislodge — a reader who thinks of cardioversion as purely the fix will miss why anticoagulation matters around it.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 36–39 and 41–46 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Two aims, always: help the heart pump better, and stop them having a stroke.
In atrial fibrillation, lots of little patches of the upper chambers fire off at random instead of one organised beat. The result is a chaotic rhythm upstairs, and the lower chambers beat fast or nearly normally depending on how much gets through.
The stroke risk works like this: blood sits still in the top chambers instead of flowing through, so a clot forms. When you put the rhythm back to normal, that clot can be flung out and go to the brain. So the most dangerous moment is the moment you fix it.
Preferred: just slow the ventricles down, long term, with a beta blocker (atenolol, metoprolol) or a heart-acting calcium channel blocker (diltiazem, verapamil). Both slow conduction through the AV node.
The alternative: actually restore normal rhythm, either with a shock or with drugs.
Preventing the stroke is a separate decision from either of those — that is what the blood thinners are for.
For scale: atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained abnormal rhythm there is, affecting around 4 million people in the United States.
Two goals: improve ventricular pumping, and prevent stroke. Every decision serves one of them.
The most common sustained dysrhythmia — about 4 million people in the United States. Multiple atrial ectopic foci fire randomly, each stimulating a small patch of atrial muscle, producing a highly irregular atrial rhythm. Ventricular rate may be rapid or nearly normal, depending on how much gets through the AV node.
Why the stroke risk exists, and why cardioversion is the dangerous moment. In AF some blood is trapped in the atria rather than flowing through to the ventricles, so a clot can form. When normal sinus rhythm is restored, that clot may dislodge and travel to the brain. The stroke risk is not just from having AF — it is concentrated at the point of fixing it.
Goal 1 — improve pumping. Two ways, and one is preferred:
Approach
How
Status
Slow the ventricular rate
Long-term β blocker (atenolol, metoprolol) or cardioselective CCB (diltiazem, verapamil) — both impede AV nodal conduction
Preferred
Restore normal sinus rhythm
DC cardioversion, or short-term drug therapy
For patients who elect it
Goal 2 — prevent stroke is what the anticoagulation is for, and it is a separate decision from rate or rhythm.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch43 §Atrial fibrillation
Gives the prevalence and mechanism of randomly firing atrial foci, clot formation from blood trapped in the atria and dislodgement when sinus rhythm returns, the two treatment goals, and rate control as preferred over rhythm restoration.
◆Slideswk2 s15
Her own coverage of atrial fibrillation management.
▣Course modulemodule wk2 §Drugs for Arrhythmias
Places atrial fibrillation among the arrhythmias the week covers.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Ranolazine MOA
Topic 35 of 67◐textbook
◐textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Only part of this concept is covered by that source.
PARTIAL. Ch. 45 names ranolazine as the drug that increases myocardial efficiency and gives the mechanism only in hedged terms — 'appears to', 'possibly'. The card reproduces that hedge rather than firming it into a confident mechanism, because the uncertainty is the book's and not ours to remove.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 36–39 and 41–46 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Ranolazine is the unusual one. Instead of changing how hard the heart works or how much blood reaches it, it seems to help the heart muscle use its energy better, so it needs less oxygen.
Notice the hedging — "appears to", "possibly". That is how the textbook itself puts it. Nobody is fully certain of the mechanism, and that uncertainty is worth carrying rather than tidying away.
Compare it with the others: nitrates take load off the heart by widening veins, beta blockers slow it down, calcium channel blockers widen arteries. Ranolazine changes none of those — it changes what the muscle does with the oxygen it already gets.
It is not used for the variant (spasm) kind of angina.
Whatever drug is used, the rest of angina care still applies: avoid what sets an attack off — overexertion, big meals, emotional stress and cold — and fix the risk factors, above all smoking, along with high blood pressure, high cholesterol and being sedentary.
The odd one out among antianginals: it works by making the myocardium use energy more efficiently.
The book will only say that it seems to lower the heart's oxygen requirement, perhaps by making the muscle better at producing energy. That tentative phrasing is the book's own, and the uncertainty is part of what you are learning.
It is listed in Ch. 45 as the drug that increases myocardial efficiency, a category of one. The other antianginals get there differently: nitrates dilate veins to cut preload, β blockers cut rate and contractility, calcium channel blockers dilate arterioles. Ranolazine changes neither the load nor the rate — it changes what the muscle does with the oxygen it already has.
In the chapter's table of antianginal drugs it is marked not used for variant angina.
Everything about angina management still applies around it: avoid the precipitants — overexertion, heavy meals, emotional stress, exposure to cold — and correct the risk factors, above all smoking, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and a sedentary lifestyle.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch45 §Ranolazine
States that ranolazine appears to decrease oxygen demand, possibly by helping the myocardium generate energy more efficiently, and marks it not used for variant angina.
✓TextbookLehne ch45 §Nondrug therapy
Lists the angina precipitants to avoid and the risk factors to correct.
◆Slideswk2 s17
Her angina slide, which places the other antianginal classes by their mechanisms.
Only part of this card is covered by the sources listed. The rest is not yet backed by anything we hold.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Nitroglycerin
Topic 36 of 67✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Ch. 45, including its dosing table and prescribing-considerations box. Both aspects are covered. The sildenafil contraindication and the patch-free interval are the two facts most likely to be examined and are quoted exactly as to numbers.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 36–39 and 41–46 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Nitroglycerin has been treating angina since 1879 and is still the first thing you reach for to stop an attack that is happening now. It works fast and costs very little.
Never combine it with sildenafil or the other drugs of that family. Both lower blood pressure, and together they can send it through the floor. Be careful too in anyone whose pressure is already low or who is on other blood-pressure drugs.
The recurring problem is tolerance — the body stops responding if the drug is there all the time:
Take the patch off after 12 to 14 hours, so there are 10 to 12 hours a day with none on.
The same happens with a long continuous drip.
Slow-release capsules must be swallowed whole, never crushed or chewed.
Under the tongue, for an attack: one tablet, repeat every 5 minutes, no more than three doses. No routine blood tests are needed — instead have them keep a diary of how often attacks come and what sets them off.
The doses and the other forms:
Under the tongue: 0.3–0.6 mg, repeated every 5 minutes, up to three doses.
Spray onto the tongue: 1–2 sprays, up to 3 in 15 minutes — also for an attack.
Ointment on the skin: 1–2 inches every 6 hours, for lasting protection.
In use since 1879, and still what you reach for first to stop an anginal attack that is happening now — effective, fast acting, inexpensive.
Contraindication — this is the one to know cold:
Use with a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor — sildenafil — is CONTRAINDICATED. Both drop blood pressure, and together they can drop it catastrophically. Also use with caution in a patient who is already hypotensive, or on any other drug that lowers blood pressure.
Side effect management — tolerance is the recurring problem:
Transdermal patch: one a day, but remove it after 12–14 hours to allow 10–12 patch-free hours each day. Without that gap, tolerance develops.
IV: tolerance develops with prolonged continuous infusion.
Extended-release oral capsules: do not crush or chew.
Forms and what each is for:
Form
Purpose
Dose
Sublingual tablet
Acute attack
0.3–0.6 mg as needed every 5 min, max three doses
Translingual spray
Acute attack
1–2 sprays, up to 3 in 15 min
Transdermal patch
Sustained prophylaxis
1 patch daily, with the drug-free interval above
Topical ointment
Sustained protection
1–2 inches every 6 h
Monitoring: no routine blood monitoring is necessary. Have the patient keep a record of how often and how badly attacks come, and what brings them on — that record is how the drug is evaluated.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch45 §Nitroglycerin
In use since 1879 and still the drug of choice for relieving an acute anginal attack.
✓TextbookLehne ch45 §Organic nitrates: trade names and dosages
Gives the forms with their indications and doses, the three-dose sublingual maximum, the 12-14 hour patch removal with 10-12 patch-free hours to avoid tolerance, the do-not-crush instruction, and tolerance with prolonged IV infusion.
✓TextbookLehne ch45 §Summary of key prescribing considerations: Nitroglycerin
States that no routine blood monitoring is needed, that caution applies in hypotension and with other BP-lowering drugs, and that use with a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor is contraindicated.
◆Slideswk2 s17
Her own angina slide, giving the nitrate mechanism as venous dilation reducing preload and coronary dilation improving flow, lowering myocardial oxygen demand.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Heparin MOA
Topic 37 of 67✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Ch. 46. The chain-length explanation is what makes the unfractionated-versus-LMW distinction memorable rather than arbitrary, and it is the book's own reasoning. Note the direction: LMW hits factor Xa MORE and thrombin LESS.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 36–39 and 41–46 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Heparin does not break up a clot. It boosts something the body already has — antithrombin, which switches off two of the clotting factors: thrombin and factor Xa. Switch those off and less fibrin gets made, so clotting slows.
Ordinary (unfractionated) heparin knocks out thrombin and factor Xa about equally.
Low-molecular-weight heparins mostly knock out factor Xa, and are much worse at touching thrombin.
Fondaparinux works on factor Xa.
The reason is simply size. To switch off thrombin, the heparin chain has to carry the active bit and be long enough for thrombin to grab onto as well. Low-molecular-weight chains are too short for that second part. Switching off factor Xa only needs the active bit, so they can still do that.
Heparin does not dissolve clots — it enhances antithrombin, the body's own brake on clotting.
Antithrombin inactivates two major clotting factors: thrombin and factor Xa. With less thrombin and factor Xa, less fibrin is produced, and clotting is suppressed. Every drug in this group shares that mechanism.
Three preparations — same mechanism, different balance:
Thrombin
Factor Xa
Unfractionated heparin
Reduced
Reduced — more or less equally
LMW heparins
Much less able to inactivate
Preferentially inactivated
Fondaparinux
—
Acts on factor Xa
Why the difference is about chain length. Switching off thrombin needs two things from a heparin chain: the active pentasaccharide sequence that turns antithrombin on, and enough length left over for thrombin itself to dock against. LMW molecules are short — they carry the sequence but have nowhere for thrombin to sit. Factor Xa needs only the sequence.
So the selectivity is not a different drug action — it is the same action with a molecule too short to complete the second half of it.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch46 §Heparin and its derivatives: Drugs that activate antithrombin
All these drugs enhance antithrombin, which inactivates thrombin and factor Xa, reducing fibrin production; and gives the differing thrombin/factor Xa balance of unfractionated heparin, LMW heparins and fondaparinux.
✓TextbookLehne ch46 §Mechanism of action (LMW heparin)
Explains that inactivating thrombin needs both the pentasaccharide sequence and enough chain length to bind thrombin, which short LMW molecules lack.
◆Slideswk2 s20
Her own coverage of anticoagulants.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Warfarin drug interactions
Topic 38 of 67✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Ch. 46's own §Drug interactions. The mechanisms are grouped by DIRECTION because that is the reversal most likely to be tested — enzyme inhibition raises the effect, induction lowers it, and mixing them up inverts the clinical consequence from bleeding to clotting.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 36–39 and 41–46 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Warfarin probably interacts with more drugs than anything else people take. And it can go wrong in both directions — too little effect and a clot forms, too much and they bleed.
Some drugs make warfarin stronger: they knock it off its carrier protein, or block the liver enzymes that destroy it, or reduce clotting factors. The result is bleeding.
Some make it weaker: they speed up the liver enzymes, increase clotting factors, or stop it being absorbed. The result is a clot.
Some do not touch warfarin at all but make bleeding likelier anyway — by stopping platelets sticking together, or by causing stomach ulcers.
Knowing an interaction exists does not mean you cannot use the two together. It means being careful. The riskiest moment is when the other drug is started or stopped — and stopping counts just as much as starting. Check the INR then.
Tell the patient plainly: nothing new without asking you first, including things off the pharmacy shelf.
There are three ways a drug can make bleeding likelier without touching warfarin at all: stopping platelets clumping, reducing clotting factors, and causing stomach ulcers.
Perhaps more clinically significant interactions than any other drug — and they fail in both directions.
An interaction can reduce the anticoagulant effect to the point of permitting thrombosis, or increase it to the point of causing haemorrhage. Both are the drug failing.
Three categories of interactant:
Drugs that increase anticoagulant effects
Drugs that promote bleeding
Drugs that decrease anticoagulant effects
Direction
Mechanisms
Increase the effect (→ haemorrhage)
Displacement of warfarin from plasma albumin; inhibition of the hepatic enzymes that degrade it; decreased synthesis of clotting factors
Decrease the effect (→ thrombosis)
Accelerated degradation via induction of hepatic enzymes; increased synthesis of clotting factors; inhibition of warfarin absorption
Promote bleeding without touching warfarin
Inhibition of platelet aggregation; inhibition of clotting factors; generation of GI ulcers
An interaction does not absolutely rule out the combination — it means using it with due caution. The danger peaks whenever an interacting drug is STARTED or STOPPED, and the INR has to be watched at both moments. Taking a drug away is as much an event as adding one.
Patients have to be warned about this and told to clear anything new with the prescriber first — shop-bought products included, not just prescriptions.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch46 §Warfarin drug interactions
Describes warfarin as subject to perhaps more significant interactions than any other drug, gives the three categories of interactant with the mechanisms that raise, lower or bleed, and names adding or withdrawing an interacting drug as the moment of greatest danger.
◆Slideswk2 s20
Her own coverage of warfarin among the anticoagulants.
▣Course modulemodule wk2 §Key Points
Places anticoagulant management among the prescribing responsibilities for cardiovascular conditions.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Rivaroxaban MOA
Topic 39 of 67◐textbook
◐textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Only part of this concept is covered by that source.
Ch. 46. PARTIAL because the fourth approved use is cut off mid-sentence in the paste we hold; the card says so in place rather than completing the list from memory. The direct-versus-indirect contrast with fondaparinux is the mechanistic point of the topic.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 36–39 and 41–46 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Rivaroxaban blocks factor Xa by attaching straight onto it. No thrombin gets made, so no clot forms.
That word directly is the point. Fondaparinux also targets factor Xa, but it works through antithrombin as a go-between. Rivaroxaban does it itself.
Compared with warfarin it has five advantages, and each one fixes a specific warfarin problem:
It starts working quickly — warfarin is slow.
The dose is fixed — warfarin has to be tuned per person.
Less bleeding.
Very few drug interactions — warfarin has more than almost anything.
No INR blood tests.
It is used after hip and knee replacements to stop clots, and to prevent stroke in atrial fibrillation, among other uses.
Its four approved uses in full: preventing clots after hip or knee replacement, preventing stroke in atrial fibrillation, treating DVT and PE, and preventing them coming back.
Selective, DIRECT inhibition of factor Xa — it binds the active centre itself.
By binding directly with the active centre of factor Xa, rivaroxaban inhibits the production of thrombin. Contrast fondaparinux, which also targets factor Xa but acts indirectly, through antithrombin. Same target, different route.
Five advantages over warfarin, shared with the other direct oral anticoagulants:
Rapid onset
Fixed dosage
Lower bleeding risk
Few drug interactions
No need for INR monitoring
Every one of those is a direct answer to a warfarin problem — warfarin's delayed onset, its individualised dosing, its haemorrhage risk, its enormous interaction list, and the INR checks all of that requires.
Four approved uses:
Preventing DVT and PE after a total hip or knee replacement
Prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation
Prevention of recurrent DVT/PE
(the fourth is in the chapter's list, treatment of DVT and PE)
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch46 §Rivaroxaban — Actions and uses
Selective direct inhibition of factor Xa by binding its active centre, inhibiting thrombin production; contrasts fondaparinux's indirect action; lists the five advantages over warfarin and the approved uses.
◆Slideswk2 s20
Her own coverage of the direct oral anticoagulants.
Only part of this card is covered by the sources listed. The rest is not yet backed by anything we hold.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Cholesterol
Topic 40 of 67✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Ch. 44. All three aspects are covered from the chapter's own sections. The point worth keeping is that statins lead on OUTCOMES rather than on LDL reduction alone — the same distinction the hypertension card makes about thiazides.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 36–39 and 41–46 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Cholesterol is not simply bad. Every cell membrane in your body is partly made of it, and you cannot make oestrogen, progesterone, testosterone or bile salts without it. It even sits in the outer layer of skin, keeping water in.
Some comes from food, and some your own cells make.
The guideline is the 2018 ACC/AHA one, and it works in stages: screen people and work out their risk, then change diet and exercise, then add drugs if the risk is high. Advice of this kind has been issued since 1988.
Statins are the strongest LDL-lowering drugs there are. They also nudge HDL up and triglycerides down in some people. But the reason they come first is not the cholesterol number — it is that they have been shown to reduce heart failure, heart attacks and sudden death. Improving the reading and improving the outcome are different achievements, and statins do both.
Two bits of vocabulary: cholesterol from food is exogenous, cholesterol your cells make is endogenous. And in the skin it does two jobs — holding water in, and keeping water-soluble substances from being absorbed through it.
Cholesterol is not a poison — it builds every cell membrane you have. The problem is LDL in excess.
What it is for, physiologically:
A component of all cell membranes and of intracellular organelle membranes.
Required to synthesise certain hormones — estrogen, progesterone, testosterone — and bile salts, which absorb and digest dietary fats.
Deposited in the stratum corneum, where it reduces water evaporation and blocks transdermal absorption of water-soluble compounds.
Some comes from the diet (exogenous) and some is manufactured by cells (endogenous).
Guidelines:
The 2018 ACC/AHA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol. High LDL causes substantial morbidity and mortality, and aggressive treatment saves lives — so periodic screening and risk assessment are recommended. If assessment shows ASCVD risk: lifestyle changes first, especially diet and exercise. If ASCVD risk is high: add LDL-lowering drugs. Guidance in this area goes back to the National Cholesterol Education Program in 1988.
Statin selection:
No drug lowers LDL and total cholesterol as effectively as a statin. They can also raise HDL and lower triglycerides in some patients. Most importantly, they improve clinical outcomes — lowering the risk of heart failure, MI and sudden death. That outcome evidence, not the LDL number, is why they are first.
Management is therefore staged: screen, assess risk, change lifestyle, and add a drug when the risk is high enough to warrant it.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch44 §Cholesterol
Gives cholesterol's roles in cell and organelle membranes, hormone and bile salt synthesis, and the stratum corneum, and separates exogenous from endogenous sources.
✓TextbookLehne ch44 §2018 ACC/AHA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol
Recommends periodic screening and risk assessment, lifestyle change where ASCVD risk exists, and LDL-lowering drugs where it is high; dates the guideline lineage to the NCEP in 1988.
Statins are the most effective drugs for lowering LDL and total cholesterol, can raise HDL and lower triglycerides in some patients, and improve clinical outcomes including heart failure, MI and sudden death.
◆Slideswk2 s22
Her own coverage of the lipid-lowering drugs.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Diuretics
Topic 41 of 67✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Ch. 42's three diuretic sections, which happen to map onto four of the school's five aspects almost one-to-one. The potassium direction is the reversal to guard: thiazides and loops LOWER it and potassium-sparing agents RAISE it, and the digoxin link runs through the low-potassium side.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 36–39 and 41–46 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
All water tablets do the same basic thing — get rid of fluid, so there is less volume to push around and the pressure drops. The differences are how much fluid they shift, whether they still work in a failing kidney, and which way they move potassium.
Thiazides (hydrochlorothiazide) — a moderate amount. Good for the long term when the swelling is mild. They stop working when the kidneys are struggling, so they are no use in severe heart failure. They lower potassium.
Loop diuretics (furosemide) — a lot of fluid, and they keep working even when the kidneys are poor. That makes them the choice in severe heart failure. They also lower potassium, and can drop the blood pressure badly by taking off too much fluid.
Potassium-sparing (spironolactone, triamterene) — barely any fluid at all. They are not there for the water; they are there to put back the potassium the other two take out. They raise potassium.
Why potassium matters so much here: low potassium makes digoxin far more likely to cause dangerous rhythms.
Two more things. Spironolactone helps people with heart failure live longer by blocking aldosterone, not by making them pass water. And because ACE inhibitors and ARBs also push potassium up, adding a potassium-sparing tablet on top needs care.
The threshold for thiazides failing is a creatinine clearance below about 40–50 mL/min.
Three classes, three amounts of diuresis, and one shared danger: what they do to potassium.
General MOA of diuretics:
All of them reduce blood volume, which lowers blood pressure and relieves congestion. What separates them is how much water they move, whether they still work when the kidney is failing, and which way they push potassium.
Thiazide
Loop
Potassium-sparing
Example
hydrochlorothiazide
furosemide
spironolactone, triamterene
Amount of diuresis
Moderate
Profound
Scant
When GFR is low
Ineffective (CrCl <40–50 mL/min)
Still works
—
Potassium
Hypokalaemia
Hypokalaemia
HYPERkalaemia
Thiazide MOA and use:
Oral, moderate diuresis, for long-term therapy in heart failure when oedema is not too great. Because they fail at low GFR, they cannot be used when cardiac output is greatly reduced.
Potassium-sparing MOA and use:
Scant diuresis — that is not why they are there. In heart failure they are used to counteract the potassium loss caused by thiazides and loop diuretics, lowering the risk of digoxin-induced dysrhythmias. Spironolactone prolongs survival by blocking aldosterone receptors, not by causing diuresis at all.
Loop adverse effects:
Hypokalaemia → increased risk of digoxin toxicity.
Severe hypotension, secondary to excessive volume reduction.
Because ACEIs and ARBs also carry a hyperkalaemia risk, combining one with a potassium-sparing diuretic needs caution — two drugs pushing potassium the same way.
Duration of the drugs:
Thiazides are the long-term agents when oedema is modest; loop diuretics are drugs of choice in severe heart failure, because they mobilise large volumes and keep working when GFR is low.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch42 §Thiazide diuretics
Moderate diuresis, oral, long-term use when oedema is modest, ineffective below a creatinine clearance of 40-50 mL/min so unusable when cardiac output is greatly reduced, and hypokalaemia raising digoxin dysrhythmia risk.
✓TextbookLehne ch42 §Loop diuretics
Profound diuresis that works even at low GFR, making them drugs of choice in severe heart failure, with hypokalaemia and severe hypotension from excessive volume reduction.
✓TextbookLehne ch42 §Potassium-sparing diuretics
Scant diuresis used to counteract potassium loss from the other two, hyperkalaemia as the principal adverse effect, caution when combined with ACEIs or ARBs, and spironolactone prolonging survival by aldosterone blockade rather than diuresis.
◆Slideswk2 s10
Her own coverage of the diuretic classes.
▣Course modulemodule wk2 §Key Points
Places diuretic choice among the week's cardiovascular prescribing decisions.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Regulation of cardiac output
Topic 42 of 67✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Ch. 36's §Regulation of cardiac output. The card is placed as the mechanism the rest of the unit hangs off, which is how the chapter itself uses it. The sympathetic/parasympathetic and beta-1/muscarinic pairings are the reversal to guard.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 36–39 and 41–46 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Cardiac output is just heart rate multiplied by stroke volume — how often it beats, times how much it pushes out each time. About 5 litres a minute in an adult, which means the heart moves your entire blood volume every minute.
Typical numbers: 70 beats a minute, 70 mL per beat, giving 4.9 litres.
The sympathetic nerves speed the heart up, through β₁ receptors in the SA node.
The parasympathetic nerves slow it down, through muscarinic receptors in the same place, along the vagus nerve.
That β₁ receptor is precisely what a beta blocker blocks. So "beta blockers slow the heart" is not a separate fact — it is this diagram with the accelerator disconnected.
Stroke volume depends on three things: how hard the muscle squeezes, how much pressure it has to push against, and how full the heart was to begin with.
This is why so many different drugs lower blood pressure: slow the rate, empty the tank, or relax the veins — all three end up in the same equation.
CO = HR × SV. Every cardiovascular drug in this unit moves one of those two terms.
Adult cardiac output runs at roughly 5 L/min — enough that the whole circulating volume passes through the heart once a minute. Typical figures: heart rate about 70 beats/min, stroke volume about 70 mL, which multiply to 4.9 L/min.
Heart rate — controlled by the autonomic nervous system:
Branch
Receptor
Where
Increased by
Sympathetic
β₁-adrenergic
SA node
Decreased by
Parasympathetic
Muscarinic
SA node, via the vagus nerve
That β₁ receptor in the SA node is exactly what a β blocker blocks. "Reduces heart rate" is not a separate fact to memorise — it is this table with one arm switched off.
Stroke volume — three determinants:
Myocardial contractility
Cardiac afterload
Cardiac preload
An increase in either HR or SV increases CO; a decrease in either decreases it. Which is why a drug can lower blood pressure by slowing the rate (β blocker), by reducing preload (a venodilator), or by reducing volume (a diuretic) — three routes to the same place.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch36 §Regulation of cardiac output
Gives CO = HR x SV with the 5 L/min, 70 beats/min and 70 mL figures, the sympathetic beta-1 and parasympathetic muscarinic control of rate at the SA node via the vagus, and contractility, afterload and preload as the determinants of stroke volume.
✓TextbookLehne ch41 §Review of blood pressure control
Illustrates lowering blood pressure through a beta blocker reducing cardiac output, a diuretic reducing blood volume, or a venodilator reducing venous return.
◆Slideswk2 s3
Her own review of cardiac output and its components.
▣Course modulemodule wk2 §Foundations for Learning
Sets adrenergic receptor physiology as the foundation for the week's cardiovascular drugs.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Ezetimibe drug interactions
Topic 43 of 67✓textbook
✓textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Ch. 44's own §Drug interactions for ezetimibe, plus its mechanism section. The distinction that matters is monitored-but-allowed with a statin versus not-recommended with a fibrate; collapsing the two loses the point of the topic.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 36–39 and 41–46 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Ezetimibe works in the gut wall: it stops cholesterol from food being absorbed, and stops cholesterol in bile being taken back up. Total cholesterol, LDL and triglycerides all come down, and HDL goes up a little.
Its interactions are about what you put it with:
With a statin — a slightly higher chance of liver irritation and of muscle problems. You can still do it, but check liver blood tests before starting and whenever it seems warranted.
With a fibrate like gemfibrozil or fenofibrate — both make bile more cholesterol-rich, so gallstones, and both raise the muscle risk. This combination is not recommended.
With a bile acid sequestrant like cholestyramine — less ezetimibe gets absorbed, so space the doses apart.
Worth noticing the difference: with a statin you monitor, with a fibrate you do not do it at all.
Two small additions: it also lowers apolipoprotein B, and colestipol may reduce its absorption in the same way cholestyramine does.
Blocks cholesterol ABSORPTION — and its interactions are all about what you combine it with.
It works at the small-intestine brush border, blocking dietary cholesterol from being taken up, and blocking cholesterol excreted in bile from being reabsorbed. It reduces total cholesterol, LDL, triglycerides and apolipoprotein B, and produces a small increase in HDL.
The three interactions to know:
Combined with
What happens
What to do
Statins
Slightly increased risk of liver damage (raised transaminases); may also increase myopathy risk
Monitor transaminases before starting and whenever clinically indicated after
Fibrates — gemfibrozil, fenofibrate
Both raise the cholesterol content of bile → gallstones; both raise myopathy risk
Combined use is not recommended
Bile acid sequestrants — cholestyramine, possibly colestipol
Reduce ezetimibe absorption
Separate the doses
Note the asymmetry. With a statin the combination is allowed but monitored. With a fibrate it is not recommended at all — because two separate harms stack, gallstones and myopathy.
The common thread in the fibrate and statin interactions is myopathy: ezetimibe raises that risk with either partner.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch44 §Ezetimibe — Mechanism of action and effect on plasma lipoproteins
Acts at the small-intestine brush border to inhibit dietary cholesterol absorption and biliary cholesterol reabsorption, lowering total cholesterol, LDL, triglycerides and apolipoprotein B with a small HDL rise.
✓TextbookLehne ch44 §Ezetimibe drug interactions
Statins add liver-damage and myopathy risk requiring transaminase monitoring; fibrates add gallstone and myopathy risk so combined use is not recommended; cholestyramine and possibly colestipol reduce its absorption.
◆Slideswk2 s22
Her own coverage of the cholesterol-lowering drugs.
▣Course modulemodule wk2 §Key Points
Places lipid management among the week's prescribing responsibilities.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.
Aspirin MI prevention
Topic 44 of 67◐textbook
◐textbook
Someone read the assigned chapter and confirmed this card against it.
Only part of this concept is covered by that source.
Ch. 46. PARTIAL because the paste we hold gives the indication list and the unknown optimal dose but the specific low-dose figure is cut off mid-sentence; the card says the dose is unknown rather than supplying a number. The men / women-65-and-older qualifier applies to PRIMARY prevention only and is the distinction most likely to be tested.
Check it yourself: open Lehne's Pharmacotherapeutics 3rd ed. ch 36–39 and 41–46 and look up this topic. If it disagrees with the card, that is worth reporting — the textbook wins over the guide.
Aspirin is used against heart attacks in four different situations, and they are not the same thing:
During or just after a heart attack, to stop the artery blocking again.
In an acute heart attack, to reduce deaths from blood-vessel causes.
After a previous heart attack, to reduce the combined risk of dying or having another one.
To prevent a first heart attack in someone who has never had one.
That last one has a qualifier the others do not: the benefit is described for men, and for women only from age 65 onwards. Once someone has already had a heart attack, that restriction does not apply.
One honest gap: nobody knows the ideal dose for preventing a first heart attack. Low doses are what get used.
In every one of these situations, preventive aspirin can reduce illness and possibly death.
Four distinct indications — and primary prevention is the one with an age and sex qualifier.
Situation
What aspirin is for
Ongoing MI / after thrombolysis
Prevent reocclusion
Acute MI
Reduce the risk of vascular mortality
Previous MI
Reduce the combined risk of death and non-fatal MI
Primary prevention of MI
Stop a first MI happening — stated for men, and for women only from 65 onward
That last row is the one to read twice. For primary prevention the benefit is stated for men, and for women only from age 65. Secondary prevention — after an MI has already happened — carries no such qualifier.
In all of these situations, prophylactic aspirin can reduce morbidity and possibly mortality.
The optimal dose for primary prevention is unknown, and low doses are used. That is an honest gap in the evidence, not a detail the book forgot.
Sources for this card
✓TextbookLehne ch46 §Aspirin — Therapeutic uses
Lists preventing reocclusion, acute MI to reduce vascular mortality, previous MI to reduce combined death and non-fatal MI, and primary prevention in men and in women aged 65 and older; and states the optimal primary-prevention dose is unknown with low doses used.
◆Slideswk2 s21
Her own coverage of antiplatelet therapy.
Only part of this card is covered by the sources listed. The rest is not yet backed by anything we hold.
Open one and check this card against it. If it disagrees, that is worth reporting.