NR507 – ADVANCED PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
NR507 Study Guide — Weeks 5–8
Weeks 5–8 — the new-material half of the cumulative final
Where this came fromThe topics are your school's, straight from the final study guide. The cards under them were written from the assigned textbook chapters and your own week 5–6 slides and webinars — and have now been read a second time against those same sources, claim by claim. The badge on each unit says how far that has got and what it found. Weeks 7–8 are still placeholders and their badges say so. Where this page and your own slides ever disagree, the card shows you both and your slides win.
Overall progress
0 / 72
Loading your progress…
Units
The badge on each unit is how much of it we have checked against the assigned textbook — ✓ verified, ◑ partly, ○ not yet, ! two sources disagree. It is not your progress; that is the bar underneath.
1
GI
!97%!Sources disagree — 97%
At least one point in this unit has two sources saying different things, and it is not resolved. That outranks the score — an open disagreement matters more than a high percentage.
- Assigned reading
- McCance & Huether Ch. 41 (with Ch. 40 and Ch. 42) · Week 5 deck and webinar
- Concepts with a source
- 26 of 26
- Open disagreements
- 1
All 26 cards re-read against Ch. 41 and checked claim by claim. Two are partial and say so on the card: esophageal stricture risk factors, which no source lists, and appendectomy risk, where the sources answer a different question. One real disagreement inside the textbook is flagged on the appendectomy card.
The percentage is how much has been LOOKED UP, not how much is correct. To check a single card, open its badge — it names the chapter or slide behind that card.
✓
Gastrointestinal pathologies
24 of 26 fully confirmed by the textbook1 partly confirmed1 where your sources disagree
Starts with Pathophysiology of GERD
0 / 26
2
Neuro
✓92%✓Verified against the textbook — 92%
Every concept in this unit has been checked against the assigned chapter, and no source disagreements are open.
- Assigned reading
- McCance & Huether Ch. 19 · Week 5 deck and webinar
- Concepts with a source
- 13 of 13
All 13 cards re-read against Ch. 19. Two are partial and say so: risk factors for depression, which the chapter never assembles into a list, and principles of prescribing antidepressants, where no titration, monitoring, black-box or discontinuation guidance exists in any source held. One card is slides-backed rather than textbook-backed.
The percentage is how much has been LOOKED UP, not how much is correct. To check a single card, open its badge — it names the chapter or slide behind that card.
✓
Neurobiological Pathologies
10 of 13 fully confirmed by the textbook2 partly confirmed1 backed by your slides
Starts with Symptoms of major depression
0 / 13
3
Endocrine
!97%!Sources disagree — 97%
At least one point in this unit has two sources saying different things, and it is not resolved. That outranks the score — an open disagreement matters more than a high percentage.
- Assigned reading
- McCance & Huether Ch. 21 and Ch. 22 · Week 6 deck and webinar · course Key Points
- Concepts with a source
- 12 of 12
- Open disagreements
- 1
All 12 cards re-read against Ch. 21 and Ch. 22. One is partial and says so: evaluating treatment by TSH, where the diagnostic pattern is taught thoroughly and the dose-titration mechanic is taught nowhere. One real disagreement between the textbook and your own deck is flagged, on the diabetes diagnosis card.
The percentage is how much has been LOOKED UP, not how much is correct. To check a single card, open its badge — it names the chapter or slide behind that card.
✓
Endocrine Pathologies
10 of 12 fully confirmed by the textbook1 partly confirmed1 where your sources disagree
Starts with Role of the hypothalamus in regulating hormones
0 / 12
4
CNS
◑82%◑Partly verified — 82%
Some of this unit is confirmed against the assigned chapter and some is not. The per-card badges say which is which.
- Assigned reading
- McCance & Huether Ch. 17 (with Ch. 18 for neuropathy and meningitis) · Week 7 Clinical Reasoning webinar (neuro + derm) — slides and transcript
- Concepts with a source
- 10 of 10
All 10 cards written from Ch. 17/18 plus the week 7 webinar, then checked claim by claim by a reader who did not write them. Two are textbook-only because the webinar never covers them — Guillain-Barré and bacterial meningitis. Myasthenia's severity classes (cnsc7) are the instructor's flagged item, but the McCance Class I–V table is in none of the held sources, so the card names that gap rather than inventing it. MS risk factors (cnsc4) are partial: the book itself calls several 'inconclusive.'
The percentage is how much has been LOOKED UP, not how much is correct. To check a single card, open its badge — it names the chapter or slide behind that card.
✓
CNS Sensory and Motor Pathologies
5 of 10 fully confirmed by the textbook1 partly confirmed4 backed by your slides
Starts with Pathophysiology of frontotemporal and vascular dementia
0 / 10
5
Brain
✓90%✓Verified against the textbook — 90%
Every concept in this unit has been checked against the assigned chapter, and no source disagreements are open.
- Assigned reading
- McCance & Huether Ch. 18 (seizures, cerebrovascular disease, headache) and Ch. 15 (cerebral circulation) · no Week 8 deck or webinar exists
- Concepts with a source
- 8 of 8
Every card is written and checked against the assigned textbook. There is no Week 8 slide deck or webinar, so unlike Weeks 5–7 there is no instructor-emphasis layer — the badge reflects textbook verification only. Two cards are partial: migraine risk factors and TIA risk factors, because the book prints no labelled list for either and each card assembles scattered data honestly.
The percentage is how much has been LOOKED UP, not how much is correct. To check a single card, open its badge — it names the chapter or slide behind that card.
✓
Brain Pathologies
6 of 8 fully confirmed by the textbook2 partly confirmed
Starts with Pathophysiology of seizure disorders
0 / 8
6
Derm
◑87%◑Partly verified — 87%
Some of this unit is confirmed against the assigned chapter and some is not. The per-card badges say which is which.
- Assigned reading
- McCance & Huether Ch. 46 (skin: psoriasis, rosacea, melanoma) · no Week 8 deck or webinar exists
- Concepts with a source
- 3 of 3
All three cards are written and checked against the assigned textbook; no Week 8 deck or webinar exists, so the badge reflects textbook verification only. The rosacea card is partial: the chapter describes rosacea's appearance in full but never states how it is diagnosed, so the card teaches the clinical picture and flags the missing method.
The percentage is how much has been LOOKED UP, not how much is correct. To check a single card, open its badge — it names the chapter or slide behind that card.
✓
Dermatological Pathologies
2 of 3 fully confirmed by the textbook1 partly confirmed
Starts with Clinical features of plaque psoriasis
0 / 3
Exam facts
Exam FormatCumulative
Question TypeMultiple Choice
Number of Questions100
Time Allotted120 minutes
PlatformExamSoft — closed book, proctored
Testing WindowWednesday Week 8, 12:01 am MT — Saturday Week 8, 11:59 pm MT
How to use this guide
How to Use This Guide
All six units are written — 72 cards across Gastrointestinal, Neurobiological, Endocrine, CNS, Brain and Dermatological, one concept per screen.
- Weeks 5–7 are built from the assigned McCance & Huether chapters and the instructor's Clinical Reasoning decks and webinars. Where a card rests on a slide rather than the book, or on the book rather than a slide, it says so.
- Week 8 — Brain and Dermatological — is from the textbook only, because no Week 8 deck or webinar exists yet, so those cards carry no instructor emphasis. Where the book gives no labelled list or diagnostic criteria (migraine and TIA risk factors, how rosacea is diagnosed), the card says so plainly rather than inventing one.
- A handful of cards are deliberately thin, and each one opens by admitting it — the sources genuinely cover less than the topic title promises. Padding them with plausible-sounding material would have been the worst available outcome, because nothing downstream would catch it.
- Every card carries a verification badge, and the badges were earned after the fact, not assumed. Each card was re-read claim by claim against the source it cites — every number, reference range, drug name and threshold located and compared. Tap a badge to see what was checked, what is only partly backed, and where two sources disagree. The badges state their own limit: that pass was a second reading by the same author, not an independent audit. It reliably catches transcription errors, misattributed sources and drifted numbers, and is weaker against an error of understanding that survived both readings.
- Every card also has a plain-English version, behind the Simplify button in the deck header. Same facts, different wording: short sentences, every piece of jargon explained the first time it appears, and most of the content broken into tables rather than paragraphs. It is meant for meeting a topic for the first time, or for reading it at 1 a.m. It is a swap rather than a reveal — one version on screen at a time, and your choice follows you across units.
- Weeks 1–4 are not in this deck. The final is cumulative, but those topics live in the midterm guide and are not duplicated here — a second copy would drift from the first.
Sources: the school's own final study guide (topics only), McCance & Huether 9th ed. chapters 15, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 26, 38, 40, 41 and 46, and the Week 5–7 Clinical Reasoning decks and webinars. Weeks 5–7 carry instructor emphasis; Week 8 (Brain, Dermatological) is built from the assigned textbook only, as no Week 8 deck or webinar exists. Weeks 1–4 are NOT repeated here — the exam is cumulative, and those topics live in the midterm guide.